From: Mergen Imeev <imeevma@tarantool.org> To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Cc: tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>, Alexander Turenko <alexander.turenko@tarantool.org> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/5] box/sql: func -- fix compilation warning Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 14:13:07 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200518111306.GA12861@tarantool.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200518101502.117121-3-gorcunov@gmail.com> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 01:14:59PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > The @r is "double" value thus use explicit > conversion to placate clang compiler. > > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> > --- > src/box/sql/func.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/box/sql/func.c b/src/box/sql/func.c > index 2c510940b..d5463facd 100644 > --- a/src/box/sql/func.c > +++ b/src/box/sql/func.c > @@ -845,9 +845,9 @@ roundFunc(sql_context * context, int argc, sql_value ** argv) > * handle the rounding directly, > * otherwise use printf. > */ > - if (n == 0 && r >= 0 && r < LARGEST_INT64 - 1) { > + if (n == 0 && r >= 0 && r < (double)(LARGEST_INT64 - 1)) { > r = (double)((sql_int64) (r + 0.5)); I am not sure that this change worth to do since LARGEST_INT64 = 2^63 -1 and (double)(LARGEST_INT64 - 1) == 2^63, if I am not wrong. I also not sure that this worked right before. I think it makes sense to compare with someting like 2^53, because if absolute value of r is greater that 2^53 than we do not have to round it anymore. > - } else if (n == 0 && r < 0 && (-r) < LARGEST_INT64 - 1) { > + } else if (n == 0 && r < 0 && (-r) < (double)(LARGEST_INT64 - 1)) { > r = -(double)((sql_int64) ((-r) + 0.5)); > } else { > const char *rounded_value = tt_sprintf("%.*f", n, r); > -- > 2.26.2 >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-18 11:13 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-05-18 10:14 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/5] build: " Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-05-18 10:14 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/5] test: unit/guava -- " Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-05-18 10:14 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/5] box/sql: func " Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-05-18 11:13 ` Mergen Imeev [this message] 2020-05-18 11:32 ` Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-05-18 10:15 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 3/5] box/sql: vdbe " Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-05-18 10:15 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 4/5] box/sql: vdbemem " Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-05-18 10:15 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 5/5] box/vynil: quota -- fix compilation waning Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-05-19 12:33 ` Nikita Pettik 2020-10-01 12:07 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/5] build: fix compilation warning Kirill Yukhin
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200518111306.GA12861@tarantool.org \ --to=imeevma@tarantool.org \ --cc=alexander.turenko@tarantool.org \ --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \ --cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/5] box/sql: func -- fix compilation warning' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox