Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirill Yukhin <kyukhin@tarantool.org>
To: Alexander Tikhonov <avtikhon@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org,
	o.piskunov@tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 2/10] gitlab-ci: enable static analysis with luacheck
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 11:11:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200422081111.gcuhjhrfpf2sgqbf@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1587499465.734344969@f324.i.mail.ru>

Hello,

On 21 апр 23:04, Alexander Tikhonov wrote:
> 
> Sergey, thank you for the patch, I have some questions on it.
> 
> Do we really want to have separate stage before the man stages with testing ? As I see you want to have the ability to avoid of testing if the initial luacheck test fails, but does it mean that issues found by the luacheck will always need changes in the code that always will change the rest of the jobs, I mean is it strong dependency between this check and the others that we can’t do the rest of the testing w/o luacheck ? We had the opinion that our testing should produce fails as fast as possible that is why we decided to remove different stages, and we can see the early fails as fast as possible, because currently all the testing start together from the very start, but in your fix will have more that 2+ minutes delay before it, while we had strong suggestion from Kirill Y. to make the testing fast as much as possible and try to make it parallel up to 2 minutes. Right, for now we have overall time of testing up to 20 minutes, but in general fastest jobs finishes in 1+ minutes and we can see the issues much faster than waiting the whole testing process.

Please use lines of sane length.

--
Regards, Kirill Yukhin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-22  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-21 14:00 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 0/10] Add " sergeyb
2020-04-21 14:00 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 1/10] Add initial luacheck config sergeyb
2020-04-21 14:00 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 2/10] gitlab-ci: enable static analysis with luacheck sergeyb
2020-04-21 20:04   ` Alexander Tikhonov
2020-04-22  8:09     ` Sergey Bronnikov
2020-04-22  8:11     ` Kirill Yukhin [this message]
2020-04-21 14:00 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 3/10] Fix luacheck warnings in extra/dist/tarantoolctl.in sergeyb
2020-04-23 11:40   ` Igor Munkin
2020-04-24  8:02     ` Sergey Bronnikov
2020-04-21 14:00 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 4/10] Fix luacheck warnings in src/lua/ sergeyb
2020-04-23 14:13   ` Igor Munkin
2020-04-24  9:12     ` Sergey Bronnikov
2020-04-21 14:00 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 5/10] Fix luacheck warnings in src/box/lua/ sergeyb
2020-04-23 22:54   ` Igor Munkin
2020-05-07 10:32     ` Sergey Bronnikov
2020-05-07 14:34       ` Sergey Bronnikov
2020-05-07 10:52     ` Sergey Bronnikov
2020-04-21 14:00 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 6/10] Fix luacheck warnings in test/ sergeyb
2020-04-27 14:38   ` Igor Munkin
2020-05-06 16:16     ` Sergey Bronnikov
2020-04-21 14:00 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 7/10] schema: fix index promotion to functional index sergeyb
2020-04-23 23:24   ` Igor Munkin
2020-04-23 23:29     ` Igor Munkin
2020-04-28 23:19       ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-04-21 14:00 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 8/10] schema: fix internal symbols dangling in _G sergeyb
2020-04-21 14:13   ` Oleg Babin
2020-04-21 14:45     ` Sergey Bronnikov
2020-04-21 19:52   ` Igor Munkin
2020-04-23 23:27     ` Igor Munkin
2020-04-28 23:19       ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-04-21 14:00 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 9/10] Disabled test/luajit-tap in luacheckrc sergeyb
2020-04-24 10:16   ` Igor Munkin
2020-04-29 14:25     ` Sergey Bronnikov
2020-04-21 14:00 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 10/10] luajit: Fix warnings spotted by luacheck sergeyb
2020-04-21 19:33   ` Igor Munkin
2020-04-22 10:14     ` Sergey Bronnikov
2020-04-23  6:24   ` Sergey Bronnikov
2020-04-23 10:03     ` Igor Munkin
2020-04-23 10:30       ` Sergey Bronnikov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200422081111.gcuhjhrfpf2sgqbf@tarantool.org \
    --to=kyukhin@tarantool.org \
    --cc=avtikhon@tarantool.org \
    --cc=o.piskunov@tarantool.org \
    --cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 2/10] gitlab-ci: enable static analysis with luacheck' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox