From: Nikita Pettik <korablev@tarantool.org> To: Alexander Tikhonov <avtikhon@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v1 1/1] lua: fix test sql/func-recreate.test.lua Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:45:08 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200417124508.GA12992@tarantool.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1587103523.376799823@f501.i.mail.ru> On 17 Apr 09:05, Alexander Tikhonov wrote: > > > > > >Пятница, 17 апреля 2020, 1:04 +03:00 от Nikita Pettik <korablev@tarantool.org>: > > > >On 17 Apr 00:15, Mergen Imeev wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 09:02:05PM +0000, Nikita Pettik wrote: > >> > On 16 Apr 23:24, Mergen Imeev wrote: > >> > > Hi! Thank you for review. My answer below. > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 07:18:51PM +0000, Nikita Pettik wrote: > >> > > > On 16 Apr 22:09, Alexander Tikhonov wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Hi Mergen, thanks for the patch, I’ve checked it on 2.2 and it runs fine, patch LGTM. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Did you verify that modified test still reproduces initial problem? > >> > > > I hope so, but ask just in case. > >> > > According to history, the main goal of this part of the > >> > > test is to show that sql_create_function() throws proper > >> > > error in case a new function is created when transaction > >> > > is active. Since the error still here, we may say that > >> > > the test works. > >> > > >> > So the answer to my question is - no, you didn't test it. > >> > Better safe than sorry - I'd better verify that updated > >> > test still covers the initial problem. Thanks. > >> > > >> Doesn't my answer says that we checked it? > > > >No, it doesn't. 'reproduce' means that you are supposed to checkout > >to branch, revert particular fix, run updated test without that fix > >and verify that test fails without fix. Any other actions do not refer > >to my original question. > I still don’t understand this check way. Please clarify: > * checkout the branch with fix based on 2.2 release branch (understood) > * revert particular fix (understood, but it is the same as checkout native 2.2 release branch, anyway ok) False. You have to revert this fix: 14ba68f93 > * «run updated test without that fix» — what does it mean «updated», ok if you mean previous revert to native 2.2 release branch, than we did it manually and in regular testings, check gitlab-ci for results, in both variants test fails > Please point what is the difference between the way I understood and the way you suggest. > > > >>However, I agree that it is never wrong to check it again. > > > >Please, check it for current fix and for any other test > >upgrade in future. > > > > > -- > Alexander Tikhonov >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-17 12:45 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-04-16 19:07 imeevma 2020-04-16 19:09 ` Alexander Tikhonov 2020-04-16 19:18 ` Nikita Pettik 2020-04-16 19:33 ` Alexander Tikhonov 2020-04-16 20:24 ` Mergen Imeev 2020-04-16 21:02 ` Nikita Pettik 2020-04-16 21:15 ` Mergen Imeev 2020-04-16 22:04 ` Nikita Pettik 2020-04-17 6:05 ` Alexander Tikhonov 2020-04-17 12:45 ` Nikita Pettik [this message] 2020-04-17 14:18 ` Mergen Imeev 2020-04-17 15:50 ` Nikita Pettik 2020-04-17 6:25 ` Mergen Imeev 2020-04-17 6:31 ` Alexander Tikhonov
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200417124508.GA12992@tarantool.org \ --to=korablev@tarantool.org \ --cc=avtikhon@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v1 1/1] lua: fix test sql/func-recreate.test.lua' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox