From: Konstantin Osipov <kostja.osipov@gmail.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v15 11/11] box/journal: redesign journal operations
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:58:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200320105842.GA30252@atlas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200320102956.GD8326@uranus>
* Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> [20/03/20 13:34]:
> > >
> > > - if (txn_write_to_wal(req) != 0)
> > > + fiber_set_txn(fiber(), NULL);
> > > + if (journal_write(req) != 0) {
> > > + fiber_set_txn(fiber(), txn);
> >
> > I wonder why do you need to clear/set txn in txn_commit()?
Forgive me for being really painful about it, but why not use
different complete callbacks for sync and async wal writes?-)
Under the hood they will still call txn_complete(), but one will
assert, and another will not?
>
> Because async write engine implies that fiber's txn is dropped.
> In particular
>
> void
> txn_complete_async(struct journal_entry *entry)
> {
> struct txn *txn = entry->complete_data;
> txn->signature = entry->res;
> /*
> * Some commit/rollback triggers require for in_txn fiber
> * variable to be set so restore it for the time triggers
> * are in progress.
> */
> --> assert(in_txn() == NULL);
> fiber_set_txn(fiber(), txn);
> txn_complete(txn);
> fiber_set_txn(fiber(), NULL);
> }
>
> Thus to not use txn.h inside journal/wall I clear it before
> the write and restore it back in case of error because rollback
> needs txn bound to a fiber.
>
> > > + txn_rollback(txn);
> > > + txn_free(txn);
> > > +
> > > + diag_set(ClientError, ER_WAL_IO);
> > > + diag_log();
> > > return -1;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > - /*
> > > - * In case of non-yielding journal the transaction could already
> > > - * be done and there is nothing to wait in such cases.
> > > - */
> > > if (!txn_has_flag(txn, TXN_IS_DONE)) {
> > > - bool cancellable = fiber_set_cancellable(false);
> > > - fiber_yield();
> > > - fiber_set_cancellable(cancellable);
> > > + txn->signature = req->res;
> > > + txn_complete(txn);
> > > + fiber_set_txn(fiber(), NULL);
> >
> > Seems you do it twice ?
>
> If you mean the txn_complete call then no, in async write
> we call the completion wich sets up TXN_IS_DONE flag, in
> turn sync write (without wal) doesn't call the completion
> and this flag is clear.
>
> Or you meant something different?
I mean fiber_set_txn() is done twice, if I am not mistaken.
--
Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-20 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-20 8:19 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v15 00/11] journal redesign sync and async writes Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-03-20 8:19 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v15 01/11] box: recovery_journal_create -- set journal here Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-03-20 8:19 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v15 02/11] box: recovery_journal -- declare it as static Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-03-20 8:19 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v15 03/11] box/txn: move fiber_set_txn to header Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-03-20 10:13 ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-03-20 10:17 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-03-20 10:23 ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-03-20 8:19 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v15 04/11] box/txn: rename txn_write to txn_commit_async Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-03-20 8:19 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v15 05/11] box/txn: move setup of txn start to txn_prepare Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-03-20 8:19 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v15 06/11] box/txn: add txn_commit_nop helper Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-03-20 8:19 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v15 07/11] box/txn: rename txn_entry_complete_cb to txn_complete_async Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-03-20 8:19 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v15 08/11] box/txn: unweave txn_commit from txn_commit_async Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-03-20 8:34 ` Oleg Babin
2020-03-20 8:46 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-03-20 8:59 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-03-20 8:19 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v15 09/11] box/txn: clear fiber storage right before journal write Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-03-20 8:19 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v15 10/11] box/txn: move journal allocation into separate routine Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-03-20 8:19 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v15 11/11] box/journal: redesign journal operations Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-03-20 10:22 ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-03-20 10:29 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-03-20 10:58 ` Konstantin Osipov [this message]
2020-03-20 11:12 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-03-20 13:09 ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-03-20 13:33 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-03-20 13:02 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v16 " Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-03-20 13:34 ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-03-20 13:58 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v15 00/11] journal redesign sync and async writes Kirill Yukhin
2020-03-21 19:51 ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-04-08 11:12 ` Kirill Yukhin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200320105842.GA30252@atlas \
--to=kostja.osipov@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v15 11/11] box/journal: redesign journal operations' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox