From: Nikita Pettik <korablev@tarantool.org>
To: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/2] box: fail in box_check_config() on bad sql cache size
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 21:00:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200305210029.GA12214@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76fb8ee1-d34c-0060-6ef0-93b182feb688@tarantool.org>
On 05 Mar 21:53, Vladislav Shpilevoy wrote:
> Hi! Thanks for the review!
>
> On 05/03/2020 12:35, Nikita Pettik wrote:
> > On 05 Mar 01:14, Vladislav Shpilevoy wrote:
> >> It was calling box_check_sql_cache_size() assuming that it
> >> throws. But it returns 0/-1.
> >> ---
> >> src/box/box.cc | 3 ++-
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/src/box/box.cc b/src/box/box.cc
> >> index 09dd67ab4..0212f34ad 100644
> >> --- a/src/box/box.cc
> >> +++ b/src/box/box.cc
> >> @@ -669,7 +669,8 @@ box_check_config()
> >> box_check_memtx_memory(cfg_geti64("memtx_memory"));
> >> box_check_memtx_min_tuple_size(cfg_geti64("memtx_min_tuple_size"));
> >> box_check_vinyl_options();
> >> - box_check_sql_cache_size(cfg_geti("sql_cache_size"));
> >> + if (box_check_sql_cache_size(cfg_geti("sql_cache_size")) != 0)
> >> + diag_raise();
> >> }
> >
> > Is it possible to test this scenario: box.sql_cache_size is set to
> > incorrect value but box.internal:cfg_check() doesn't verify it?
> > I mean supply this patch with test case. If it turns out to be
> > too complicated, then nevermind. LGTM otherwise.
>
> It is not testable. Sql_cache_size is always set from
> box_set_prepared_stmt_cache_size(), on first and all
> next configurations, and is always checked for returned
> value.
Ok, then mb it would be better to check rc in assertion
instead of diag_raise().. (since it can't fail here anyway)?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-05 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-05 0:14 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/2] box.cfg() check memtx/vinyl_memory Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-03-05 0:14 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/2] box: fail in box_check_config() on bad sql cache size Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-03-05 11:35 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-03-05 20:53 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-03-05 21:00 ` Nikita Pettik [this message]
2020-03-05 21:17 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-03-19 15:27 ` Igor Munkin
2020-03-20 0:11 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-03-05 0:14 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/2] box: on cfg properly check memory quota Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-03-05 11:41 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-03-20 13:56 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/2] box.cfg() check memtx/vinyl_memory Nikita Pettik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200305210029.GA12214@tarantool.org \
--to=korablev@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/2] box: fail in box_check_config() on bad sql cache size' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox