From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> To: tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> Cc: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> Subject: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v8 2/2] fiber: leak slab if unable to bring prots back Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:22:20 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200214132220.29830-3-gorcunov@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200214132220.29830-1-gorcunov@gmail.com> In case if we unable to revert guard page back to read|write we should never use such slab again. Initially I thought of just put panic here and exit but it is too destructive. I think better print an error and continue. If node admin ignore this message then one moment at future there won't be slab left for use and creating new fibers get prohibited. In future (hopefully near one) we plan to drop guard pages to prevent VMA fracturing and use stack marks instead. Reviewed-by: Alexander Turenko <alexander.turenko@tarantool.org> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> --- src/lib/core/fiber.c | 11 +++++++++-- test/unit/fiber_stack.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- test/unit/fiber_stack.result | 5 ++++- 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/lib/core/fiber.c b/src/lib/core/fiber.c index f10687b29..73de7765b 100644 --- a/src/lib/core/fiber.c +++ b/src/lib/core/fiber.c @@ -1055,15 +1055,22 @@ fiber_stack_destroy(struct fiber *fiber, struct slab_cache *slabc) * to setup the original protection back in * background. * + * For now lets keep such slab referenced and + * leaked: if mprotect failed we must not allow + * to reuse such slab with PROT_NONE'ed page + * inside. + * * Note that in case if we're called from * fiber_stack_create() the @a mprotect_flags is * the same as the slab been created with, so * calling mprotect for VMA with same flags * won't fail. */ - diag_log(); + say_syserror("fiber: Can't put guard page to slab. " + "Leak %zu bytes", (size_t)fiber->stack_size); + } else { + slab_put(slabc, fiber->stack_slab); } - slab_put(slabc, fiber->stack_slab); } } diff --git a/test/unit/fiber_stack.c b/test/unit/fiber_stack.c index 103dfaf0d..41abe3764 100644 --- a/test/unit/fiber_stack.c +++ b/test/unit/fiber_stack.c @@ -15,11 +15,13 @@ noop_f(va_list ap) static int main_f(va_list ap) { + struct slab_cache *slabc = &cord()->slabc; + size_t used_before, used_after; struct errinj *inj; struct fiber *fiber; header(); - plan(4); + plan(6); /* * Set non-default stack size to prevent reusing of an @@ -47,8 +49,7 @@ main_f(va_list ap) ok(diag_get() != NULL, "mprotect: diag is armed after error"); /* - * Check madvise. We can't test the fiber destroy - * path since it is cleaning error. + * Check madvise error on fiber creation. */ diag_clear(diag_get()); inj = errinj(ERRINJ_FIBER_MADVISE, ERRINJ_BOOL); @@ -59,6 +60,35 @@ main_f(va_list ap) ok(fiber != NULL, "madvise: non critical error on madvise hint"); ok(diag_get() != NULL, "madvise: diag is armed after error"); + /* + * Check if we leak on fiber destruction. + * We will print an error and result get + * compared by testing engine. + */ + fiber_attr_delete(fiber_attr); + fiber_attr = fiber_attr_new(); + fiber_attr->flags |= FIBER_CUSTOM_STACK; + fiber_attr->stack_size = 64 << 10; + + diag_clear(diag_get()); + + used_before = slabc->allocated.stats.used; + + fiber = fiber_new_ex("test_madvise", fiber_attr, noop_f); + ok(fiber != NULL, "fiber with custom stack"); + fiber_set_joinable(fiber, true); + + inj = errinj(ERRINJ_FIBER_MPROTECT, ERRINJ_INT); + inj->iparam = PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE; + + fiber_start(fiber); + fiber_join(fiber); + inj->iparam = -1; + + used_after = slabc->allocated.stats.used; + ok(used_after > used_before, "expected leak detected"); + + fiber_attr_delete(fiber_attr); footer(); ev_break(loop(), EVBREAK_ALL); diff --git a/test/unit/fiber_stack.result b/test/unit/fiber_stack.result index 43ff74b2f..7cae4e96c 100644 --- a/test/unit/fiber_stack.result +++ b/test/unit/fiber_stack.result @@ -1,8 +1,11 @@ SystemError fiber mprotect failed: Cannot allocate memory +fiber: Can't put guard page to slab. Leak 57344 bytes: Cannot allocate memory *** main_f *** -1..4 +1..6 ok 1 - mprotect: failed to setup fiber guard page ok 2 - mprotect: diag is armed after error ok 3 - madvise: non critical error on madvise hint ok 4 - madvise: diag is armed after error +ok 5 - fiber with custom stack +ok 6 - expected leak detected *** main_f: done *** -- 2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-14 13:22 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-02-14 13:22 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v8 0/2] fiber: Handle stack madvise/mprotect errors Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-02-14 13:22 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v8 1/2] fiber: set diagnostics at madvise/mprotect failure Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-02-20 21:30 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2020-02-14 13:22 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message] 2020-02-14 14:17 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v8 2/2] fiber: leak slab if unable to bring prots back Konstantin Osipov 2020-02-14 14:22 ` Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-02-14 14:29 ` Konstantin Osipov 2020-02-14 14:31 ` Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-02-20 21:00 ` Alexander Turenko 2020-02-21 7:15 ` Konstantin Osipov 2020-02-24 19:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v8 0/2] fiber: Handle stack madvise/mprotect errors Kirill Yukhin 2020-02-24 19:31 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200214132220.29830-3-gorcunov@gmail.com \ --to=gorcunov@gmail.com \ --cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v8 2/2] fiber: leak slab if unable to bring prots back' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox