From: Konstantin Osipov <kostja.osipov@gmail.com>
To: sergepetrenko <sergepetrenko@tarantool.org>,
georgy@tarantool.org, tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 4/5] vclock: ignore 0th component in comparisons.
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 08:02:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191226050259.GD1337@atlas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191226044338.GB1337@atlas>
* Konstantin Osipov <kostja.osipov@gmail.com> [19/12/26 07:43]:
> * sergepetrenko <sergepetrenko@tarantool.org> [19/12/16 09:47]:
> > 0th vclock component will be used to count replica-local rows of an
> > anonymous replica. These rows won't be replicated and different
> > instances will have different values in vclock[0]. So ignore 0th
> > component in comparisons.
>
> I don't know how this is going to work going forward.
>
> vclock id 0 is already reserved for snapshots/the changes
> of expelled replicas.
A much safer bet would be to use a new special id number, like
UINT64_MAX, and not change meaning of an existing id.
--
Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-26 5:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-15 20:56 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/5] introduce anonymous replicas sergepetrenko
2019-12-15 20:58 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/5] box: update comment describing join protocol sergepetrenko
2019-12-22 17:58 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-12-23 21:12 ` Sergey Petrenko
2019-12-15 20:58 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/5] replication: do not decode replicaset uuid when processing a subscribe sergepetrenko
2019-12-15 20:58 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 3/5] applier: split join processing into two stages sergepetrenko
2019-12-22 17:59 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-12-23 22:10 ` Sergey Petrenko
2019-12-24 15:50 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-12-15 20:58 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 4/5] vclock: ignore 0th component in comparisons sergepetrenko
2019-12-22 17:59 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-12-23 21:26 ` Sergey Petrenko
2019-12-23 22:58 ` Sergey Petrenko
2019-12-26 4:43 ` Konstantin Osipov
2019-12-26 5:02 ` Konstantin Osipov [this message]
2019-12-27 12:56 ` Sergey Petrenko
2019-12-27 13:31 ` Konstantin Osipov
2019-12-27 13:48 ` Sergey Petrenko
2019-12-27 14:40 ` Konstantin Osipov
2019-12-15 20:58 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 5/5] replication: introduce anonymous replica sergepetrenko
2019-12-16 13:28 ` Serge Petrenko
2019-12-20 12:06 ` Serge Petrenko
2019-12-22 17:58 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-12-25 12:40 ` Sergey Petrenko
2019-12-25 18:23 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-12-26 16:08 ` Sergey Petrenko
2019-12-15 21:00 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/5] introduce anonymous replicas Sergey Petrenko
2019-12-18 7:49 ` Georgy Kirichenko
2019-12-20 12:07 ` Serge Petrenko
2019-12-20 12:17 ` Serge Petrenko
2019-12-22 17:59 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191226050259.GD1337@atlas \
--to=kostja.osipov@gmail.com \
--cc=georgy@tarantool.org \
--cc=sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 4/5] vclock: ignore 0th component in comparisons.' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox