From: Alexander Turenko <alexander.turenko@tarantool.org> To: Igor Munkin <imun@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org, Kirill Yukhin <kyukhin@tarantool.org> Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 1/1] test: move luajit-tap suite to luajit repo Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:08:56 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190910160856.vyvgqn6pxut4vaqj@tkn_work_nb> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1568130564.240180883@f341.i.mail.ru> I missed the magic word: LGTM :) CCed Kirill. WBR, Alexander Turenko. On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 06:49:24PM +0300, Igor Munkin wrote: > > Sasha, > > Thanks for you review. > >Вторник, 10 сентября 2019, 17:17 +03:00 от Alexander Turenko <alexander.turenko@tarantool.org>: > > > >Maybe update the commit to update luajit submodule here, when we'll push > >the patch to the luajit default branch (named 'tarantool')? > > > >While we are here, it worth to update the branch in .gitmodules (now it > >points to 'tarantool-1.7', but should point to 'tarantool'). If one will > >use git submodule update --remote, then it can confuse. Can be done > >right in this commit, just mention it in the commit message. > Totally agree with your remark and as discussed I propose the following: > * Update submodule to the required branch within a separate commit (not included in current branch) Okay, it is on you. > * Apply the patch with luajit-tap tests to tarantool/luajit repo (the patch mentioned below) > * Apply another patch removing corresponding tests from tarantool source tree > Kirill, if you have another workflow for such modifications, I'm open for a discussion. I'm okay with updating the submodule within this commit or in a separate commit: this is the minor thing. If we'll separate them I only vote to update the submodule first: consider, for example performing git bisect using one of tests from luajit-tap. I also vote to push it to all long-term branches down to 1.10, because most of luajit-related commits are for all branches (as bugfixes): it will be convenient to have uniform testing machinery. > > > >Out-of-source build missed small and luajit-tap test suites (it is > >already so for small). Don't sure whether it should block the commit. > >See more in the luajit's patch review: > >https://www.freelists.org/post/tarantool-patches/PATCH-11-test-add-tests-from-tarantool-source-tree,1 BTW, filed https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/4485 > >On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 05:01:53PM +0300, Igor Munkin wrote: > >> * All test chunks related to luajit were moved from tarantool source > >> tree to the luajit repo > >> * Adjusted CMakeLists via creating a symlink to luajit test directory > >> to fix out-of-source tests > >> > >> Closed #4478 > >> --- > >> .gitignore | 1 + > >> test/CMakeLists.txt | 10 + > >> test/luajit-tap/fold_bug_LuaJIT_505.test.lua | 20 -- > >> test/luajit-tap/gh.test.lua | 17 -- > >> test/luajit-tap/suite.ini | 5 - > >> .../table_chain_bug_LuaJIT_494.test.lua | 178 ------------------ > >> test/luajit-tap/unsink_64_kptr.test.lua | 44 ----- > >> 7 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 264 deletions(-) > >> delete mode 100755 test/luajit-tap/fold_bug_LuaJIT_505.test.lua > >> delete mode 100755 test/luajit-tap/gh.test.lua > >> delete mode 100644 test/luajit-tap/suite.ini > >> delete mode 100755 test/luajit-tap/table_chain_bug_LuaJIT_494.test.lua > >> delete mode 100755 test/luajit-tap/unsink_64_kptr.test.lua > > > -- > IM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-10 16:09 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-09-05 14:01 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/1] Move luajit-related tests " Igor Munkin 2019-09-05 14:01 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/1] test: move luajit-tap suite " Igor Munkin 2019-09-10 14:17 ` [tarantool-patches] " Alexander Turenko 2019-09-10 15:49 ` [tarantool-patches] Re[2]: [tarantool-patches] " Igor Munkin 2019-09-10 16:08 ` Alexander Turenko [this message] 2019-09-11 18:22 ` [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 0/1] Move luajit-related tests " Kirill Yukhin
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190910160856.vyvgqn6pxut4vaqj@tkn_work_nb \ --to=alexander.turenko@tarantool.org \ --cc=imun@tarantool.org \ --cc=kyukhin@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \ --subject='[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 1/1] test: move luajit-tap suite to luajit repo' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox