From: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@tarantool.org>
To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org
Cc: Georgy Kirichenko <georgy@tarantool.org>
Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 0/7] Replication: In-memory replication
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 16:47:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190816134709.GA18643@atlas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1565676868.git.georgy@tarantool.org>
* Georgy Kirichenko <georgy@tarantool.org> [19/08/13 10:30]:
Georgy,
Could you please benchmark this? Does latency improve? How does
this patch change CPU utilization with intensive replication, 1,
2, 3 replicas?
Results could be quite good (I hope).
--
Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-16 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-13 6:27 [tarantool-patches] " Georgy Kirichenko
2019-08-13 6:27 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/7] Refactoring: wal writer fiber and queue Georgy Kirichenko
2019-08-16 13:53 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2019-08-20 10:57 ` Георгий Кириченко
2019-08-21 10:18 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladimir Davydov
2019-08-13 6:27 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/7] Refactoring: Track wal files using gc state Georgy Kirichenko
2019-08-21 10:44 ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-08-13 6:27 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 3/7] Replication: Relay does not rely on xlog boundaries Georgy Kirichenko
2019-08-21 11:35 ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-08-13 6:27 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 4/7] Replication: wal memory buffer Georgy Kirichenko
2019-08-21 11:57 ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-08-13 6:27 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 5/7] Replication: in memory replication Georgy Kirichenko
2019-08-21 13:52 ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-08-13 6:27 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 6/7] Refactoring: remove wal_watcher routines Georgy Kirichenko
2019-08-21 13:52 ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-08-13 6:27 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 7/7] Refactoring: get rid of on_close_log Georgy Kirichenko
2019-08-21 13:52 ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-08-16 13:47 ` Konstantin Osipov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190816134709.GA18643@atlas \
--to=kostja@tarantool.org \
--cc=georgy@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \
--subject='[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 0/7] Replication: In-memory replication' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox