From: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@tarantool.org>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shcherbatov <kshcherbatov@tarantool.org>,
tarantool-patches@freelists.org, v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] box: introduce opts.is_multikey function option
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 12:55:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190726095504.GF9916@atlas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190726092254.GR24631@esperanza>
* Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> [19/07/26 12:23]:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 09:39:43PM +0300, Kirill Shcherbatov wrote:
> > Needed for #1260
> >
> > @TarantoolBot document
> > Title: A new option is_multikey for function definition
> >
> > A new option is_multikey allows to specify wether new function
> > returns multiple values packed in a table object. This is a
> > native way to define multikey func_index.
>
> Personally, I'd call this option is_multireturn. Not insisting though.
> The patch looks good to me.
OK
--
Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-26 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-25 18:39 [PATCH v5 0/3] box: functional indexes Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-07-25 18:39 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] box: introduce opts.is_multikey function option Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-07-26 9:22 ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-07-26 9:55 ` Konstantin Osipov [this message]
2019-07-25 18:39 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] box: introduce tuple_chunk infrastructure Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-07-26 9:35 ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-07-25 18:39 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] box: introduce func_index Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-07-26 9:49 ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-07-26 9:57 ` Konstantin Osipov
2019-07-26 10:10 ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-07-26 19:31 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2019-07-27 11:42 ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-07-28 21:30 ` Konstantin Osipov
2019-07-26 9:43 [PATCH v5 0/3] box: functional indexes Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-07-26 9:43 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] box: introduce opts.is_multikey function option Kirill Shcherbatov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190726095504.GF9916@atlas \
--to=kostja@tarantool.org \
--cc=kshcherbatov@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \
--cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] box: introduce opts.is_multikey function option' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox