[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH] Output of fiber.info will contain only non-idle fibers

[Konstantin Osipov <kostja@tarantool.org>]

* Kirill Yukhin <kyukhin@tarantool.org> [19/07/24 11:03]:

> > * Maria K <marianneliash@gmail.com> [19/07/23 21:01]:
> > > The output used to be too cluttered due to idle ones.
> > > 
> > > Closes #4235
> > 
> > @kyukhin, first, please I don't get how does this get scheduled to a
> > milestone? How does this follow triage guidelines? 
> 
> I won't ever discuss any internal documents publicly, sorry.
> I believe this contradicts ethitcs. That is second time you doing
> this, please stop.

Well, I guess then it is time to make  SOP public.

How do you expect me to participate in it as a community member if
I don't share how the project is run and direction it takes? 

I've been mentioning this before -- things will have to become more
open, including defining the product roadmap and what features get
in, if we're to switch to a community driven model.

You can't expect one contributor party to drive the roadmap and
another merely do the review work.

> 
> > Please don't schedule anything that is not a priority, even if
> > it's a noob issue, since it takes time of everyone involved.
> 
> That was a customer request. If you'd like not to review the patch -
> feel free to just skip it, we'll find another reviewer.

Well, then it has to be well defined- I pointed out obvious
issues with this change. 

PS And no, TTLing reviews is also a wrong idea. One or two bad
patches getting in like that and it will be easier for me to fork
and cherry-pick changes than provide any reviews and work on a
common trunk.

-- 
Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia