From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> To: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Replace schema lock with fine-grained locking Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 22:56:05 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190703195605.dhuoxv7xrxqzklug@esperanza> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190703193541.GH17318@atlas> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 10:35:41PM +0300, Konstantin Osipov wrote: > * Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> [19/07/01 10:04]: > > Now, as we don't need to take the schema lock for checkpointing, it is > > only used to synchronize concurrent space modifications (drop, truncate, > > alter). Actually, a global lock is a way too heavy means to achieve this > > goal, because we only care about forbidding concurrent modifications of > > the same space while concurrent modifications of different spaces should > > work just fine. So this patch replaces schema lock with a per-space > > flag. The flag is called is_in_alter and set by alter_space_new() and > > cleared by alter_space_delete(). If the flag is already set when > > alter_space_new() is called, an error is thrown. > > Uh-oh. > > Could you please do a bit more coding? > > There are inherent dangers in using a boolean flag rather than a > normal lock: > - lock life time is bound to object life time > - there is no way to put itself into a wait queue > - there is an implicit assumption that a fiber only takes one lock > and no way to inspect/free all locks of a fiber. > - deadlock detection is impossible. TBO I don't think you follow. It isn't a lock, actually. It's just a flag saying the space is busy building an index. If someone tries to do something with a space that is busy, they will fail. This is consistent with vinyl tx manager behavior. No deadlock is possible by design. I don't see any point implementing some kind of generic locking scheme at this point, because as I said, there are actually no locks. I think we should get to this once we start thinking about locking in the transaction manager, not now. > > Let's add a normal name-based locking for this: > > struct lock { > enum object_type object_type; > char *object_name; > enum { S, X } type; > struct lock *pending; > struct fiber *owner; // ideally it should be struct txn, or int txn_id, not struct fiber > }; > > hash<lock> metadata_locks; > > This could be a separate module in box.cc. The api should take > locks by name: > > struct lock *metadata_lock_get(enum object_type type, char > *object_name, enum lock_type type, int txn_id); > > and unlock by value or txn_id: > > void metadata_lock_free(struct lock *lock); > > void metadata_lock_free_all(int txn_id);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-03 19:56 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-06-30 19:40 [PATCH 0/6] Get rid of the schema lock Vladimir Davydov 2019-06-30 19:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] Add ERROR_INJECT_YIELD and ERROR_INJECT_SLEEP helpers Vladimir Davydov 2019-07-03 19:12 ` Konstantin Osipov 2019-07-04 15:50 ` Vladimir Davydov 2019-06-30 19:40 ` [PATCH 2/6] Replace ERRINJ_SNAP_WRITE_ROW_TIMEOUT with ERRINJ_SNAP_WRITE_DELAY Vladimir Davydov 2019-07-03 19:13 ` Konstantin Osipov 2019-07-04 15:51 ` Vladimir Davydov 2019-06-30 19:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] Don't take schema lock for checkpointing Vladimir Davydov 2019-07-03 19:21 ` Konstantin Osipov 2019-07-03 20:05 ` Vladimir Davydov 2019-06-30 19:40 ` [PATCH 4/6] test: make vinyl/replica_rejoin more stable Vladimir Davydov 2019-07-03 19:23 ` Konstantin Osipov 2019-07-04 15:51 ` Vladimir Davydov 2019-06-30 19:40 ` [PATCH 5/6] vinyl: don't yield while logging index creation Vladimir Davydov 2019-06-30 19:40 ` [PATCH 6/6] Replace schema lock with fine-grained locking Vladimir Davydov 2019-07-03 19:35 ` Konstantin Osipov 2019-07-03 19:56 ` Vladimir Davydov [this message] 2019-07-04 8:09 ` Konstantin Osipov 2019-07-04 17:06 ` Vladimir Davydov 2019-07-08 7:40 ` Konstantin Osipov 2019-07-08 8:41 ` Vladimir Davydov 2019-07-05 8:53 ` [PATCH 0/6] Get rid of the schema lock Vladimir Davydov
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190703195605.dhuoxv7xrxqzklug@esperanza \ --to=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \ --cc=kostja@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH 6/6] Replace schema lock with fine-grained locking' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox