From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> To: Alexander Turenko <alexander.turenko@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] Add merger for tuples streams (C part) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 18:34:15 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190430153415.beufsnt2txjhkkhc@esperanza> (raw) In-Reply-To: <963ad528ad35199943931150956c1d5e2c374c40.1554906327.git.alexander.turenko@tarantool.org> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 06:21:24PM +0300, Alexander Turenko wrote: > diff --git a/src/box/merger.c b/src/box/merger.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000..83f628758 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/src/box/merger.c > @@ -0,0 +1,464 @@ > +/* > + * Copyright 2010-2019, Tarantool AUTHORS, please see AUTHORS file. > + * > + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or > + * without modification, are permitted provided that the following > + * conditions are met: > + * > + * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above > + * copyright notice, this list of conditions and the > + * following disclaimer. > + * > + * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above > + * copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following > + * disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials > + * provided with the distribution. > + * > + * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY <COPYRIGHT HOLDER> ``AS IS'' AND > + * ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED > + * TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR > + * A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL > + * <COPYRIGHT HOLDER> OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, > + * INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL > + * DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF > + * SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR > + * BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF > + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT > + * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF > + * THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF > + * SUCH DAMAGE. > + */ > + > +#include "box/merger.h" > + > +#include <assert.h> > +#include <stdbool.h> > +#include <stdint.h> > +#include <stdlib.h> > + > +#define HEAP_FORWARD_DECLARATION > +#include "salad/heap.h" > + > +#include "trivia/util.h" /* unlikely() */ > +#include "diag.h" /* diag_set() */ > +#include "say.h" /* panic() */ > +#include "box/tuple.h" /* box_tuple_unref() */ > +#include "box/tuple_format.h" /* box_tuple_format_*(), > + tuple_format_id() */ > +#include "box/key_def.h" /* box_key_def_*(), > + box_tuple_compare() */ > + > +/* {{{ Create, delete, ref, unref a source and a context */ > + > +enum { MERGER_SOURCE_REF_MAX = INT_MAX }; > +enum { MERGER_CONTEXT_REF_MAX = INT_MAX }; > + > +void > +merger_source_ref(struct merger_source *source) I tend to agree with Kostja that merger_source sounds sort of awkward, like it's a source of mergers (cf. tuple_source - source of tuples). Similarly, merger_context => merge_context. BTW what about including 'reverse' in merge_context? > +{ > + if (unlikely(source->refs >= MERGER_SOURCE_REF_MAX)) > + panic("Merger source reference counter overflow"); > + ++source->refs; > +} > + > +void > +merger_source_unref(struct merger_source *source) > +{ > + assert(source->refs - 1 >= 0); > + if (--source->refs == 0) > + source->vtab->delete(source); > +} > + > +void > +merger_source_new(struct merger_source *source, struct merger_source_vtab *vtab) We typically call a constructor function _create: merger_source_create. > +{ > + source->vtab = vtab; > + source->refs = 0; > +} > + > +void > +merger_context_delete(struct merger_context *ctx) > +{ > + box_key_def_delete(ctx->key_def); > + box_tuple_format_unref(ctx->format); I suggest avoid using box_ methods in the code - after all those are intended for external modules. Creating a key_def with key_def_dup and freeing it with box_key_def_delete looks especially weird. Let's use the underlying functions directly, shall we? > + free(ctx); > +} > + > +void > +merger_context_ref(struct merger_context *ctx) > +{ > + if (unlikely(ctx->refs >= MERGER_CONTEXT_REF_MAX)) Wow, I wouldn't care, but okay. > + panic("Merger context reference counter overflow"); > + ++ctx->refs; > +} > + > +void > +merger_context_unref(struct merger_context *ctx) > +{ > + assert(ctx->refs - 1 >= 0); > + if (--ctx->refs == 0) > + merger_context_delete(ctx); > +} > + > +struct merger_context * > +merger_context_new(const struct key_def *key_def) > +{ > + struct merger_context *ctx = (struct merger_context *) malloc( Useless type conversion. There are a few more places like that. > + sizeof(struct merger_context)); > + if (ctx == NULL) { > + diag_set(OutOfMemory, sizeof(struct merger_context), "malloc", > + "merger_context"); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + /* > + * We need to copy key_def, because a key_def from the > + * parameter can be collected before merger_context end > + * of life (say, by LuaJIT GC if the key_def comes from > + * Lua). > + */ > + ctx->key_def = key_def_dup(key_def); > + if (ctx->key_def == NULL) { > + free(ctx); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + ctx->format = box_tuple_format_new(&ctx->key_def, 1); > + if (ctx->format == NULL) { > + box_key_def_delete(ctx->key_def); > + free(ctx); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + ctx->refs = 0; > + > + return ctx; > +} > + > +/* }}} */ > + > +/* {{{ Merger */ > + > +/** > + * Holds a source to fetch next tuples and a last fetched tuple to > + * compare the node against other nodes. > + * > + * The main reason why this structure is separated from a merger > + * source is that a heap node can not be a member of several > + * heaps. > + * > + * The second reason is that it allows to incapsulate all heap encapsulate :) > + * related logic inside this compilation unit, without any trails 'trails' sounds weird to me in this context. I'd say 'traces'. > + * in externally visible structures. Not sure that these two reasons are ironclad: - It's pointless to add the same source to two mergers (or to the same merger twice). I think we'd better simply proscribe it. There's a handy heap_node_is_stray helper that could be used to detect if a source is already used by a merger. - merger_heap_node is pretty lightweight: it stores only pointers and struct heap_node so all we need is include salad/heap.h into merger.h, which seems to be okay. At the same time, not introducing a separate anchor struct would reduce the amount of code you have to add and hence make the code a bit easier to follow IMO. > + */ > +struct merger_heap_node { > + /* A source of tuples. */ > + struct merger_source *source; > + /* > + * A last fetched (refcounted) tuple to compare against > + * other nodes. > + */ > + struct tuple *tuple; > + /* An anchor to make the structure a merger heap node. */ > + struct heap_node heap_node_anchor; We typically call anchors after the accommodating container, in_merger in this case. > +}; > + > +static bool > +merger_source_less(const heap_t *heap, const struct merger_heap_node *left, > + const struct merger_heap_node *right); > +#define HEAP_NAME merger_heap > +#define HEAP_LESS merger_source_less > +#define heap_value_t struct merger_heap_node > +#define heap_value_attr heap_node_anchor > +#include "salad/heap.h" > +#undef HEAP_NAME > +#undef HEAP_LESS > +#undef heap_value_t > +#undef heap_value_attr > + > +/** > + * Holds a heap, an immutable context, parameters of a merge > + * process and utility fields. > + */ > +struct merger { > + /* A merger is a source. */ > + struct merger_source base; > + /* > + * Whether a merge process started. > + * > + * The merger postpones charging of heap nodes until a > + * first output tuple is acquired. > + */ > + bool started; > + /* A merger context. */ > + struct merger_context *ctx; > + /* > + * A heap of sources (of nodes that contains a source to > + * be exact). > + */ > + heap_t heap; > + /* An array of heap nodes. */ > + uint32_t nodes_count; node_count :) > + struct merger_heap_node *nodes; > + /* Ascending (false) / descending (true) order. */ > + bool reverse; > +}; > + > +/* Helpers */ > + > +/** > + * Data comparing function to construct a heap of sources. > + */ > +static bool > +merger_source_less(const heap_t *heap, const struct merger_heap_node *left, > + const struct merger_heap_node *right) > +{ > + if (left->tuple == NULL && right->tuple == NULL) > + return false; > + if (left->tuple == NULL) > + return false; > + if (right->tuple == NULL) > + return true; How can this happen? I thought we would remove a source that ended iteration (returned NULL), no? > + struct merger *merger = container_of(heap, struct merger, heap); > + int cmp = box_tuple_compare(left->tuple, right->tuple, > + merger->ctx->key_def); > + return merger->reverse ? cmp >= 0 : cmp < 0; > +} > + > +/** > + * How much more memory the heap will reserve at the next grow. > + * > + * See HEAP(reserve)() function in lib/salad/heap.h. > + */ > +static size_t > +heap_next_grow_size(const heap_t *heap) Please don't introduce this function so intricately depending on the heap implementation solely for error reporting - simply pass 0 to diag_set(OutOfMemory) - it's perfectly fine, we do that all the time. > +{ > + heap_off_t heap_capacity_diff = heap->capacity == 0 ? > + HEAP_INITIAL_CAPACITY : heap->capacity; > + return heap_capacity_diff * sizeof(struct heap_node *); > +} > + > +/** > + * Initialize a new merger heap node. > + */ > +static void > +merger_heap_node_new(struct merger_heap_node *node, > + struct merger_source *source) > +{ > + node->source = source; > + merger_source_ref(node->source); > + node->tuple = NULL; > + heap_node_create(&node->heap_node_anchor); > +} > + > +/** > + * Free a merger heap node. > + */ > +static void > +merger_heap_node_delete(struct merger_heap_node *node) > +{ > + merger_source_unref(node->source); > + if (node->tuple != NULL) > + box_tuple_unref(node->tuple); > +} > + > +/** > + * The helper to add a new heap node to a merger heap. > + * > + * Return -1 at an error and set a diag. > + * > + * Otherwise store a next tuple in node->tuple, add the node to > + * merger->heap and return 0. > + */ > +static int > +merger_add_heap_node(struct merger *merger, struct merger_heap_node *node) > +{ > + struct tuple *tuple = NULL; > + > + /* Acquire a next tuple. */ > + struct merger_source *source = node->source; > + if (source->vtab->next(source, merger->ctx->format, &tuple) != 0) > + return -1; > + > + /* Don't add an empty source to a heap. */ > + if (tuple == NULL) > + return 0; > + > + node->tuple = tuple; > + > + /* Add a node to a heap. */ > + if (merger_heap_insert(&merger->heap, node)) { According to our coding conventions, != 0 should be checked explicitly. > + diag_set(OutOfMemory, heap_next_grow_size(&merger->heap), > + "malloc", "merger->heap"); > + return -1; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* Virtual methods declarations */ > + > +static void > +merger_delete(struct merger_source *base); > +static int > +merger_next(struct merger_source *base, box_tuple_format_t *format, > + struct tuple **out); > + > +/* Non-virtual methods */ > + > +struct merger_source * > +merger_new(struct merger_context *ctx) > +{ > + static struct merger_source_vtab merger_vtab = { > + .delete = merger_delete, > + .next = merger_next, > + }; > + > + struct merger *merger = (struct merger *) malloc(sizeof(struct merger)); > + if (merger == NULL) { > + diag_set(OutOfMemory, sizeof(struct merger), "malloc", > + "merger"); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + merger_source_new(&merger->base, &merger_vtab); > + > + merger->started = false; > + merger->ctx = ctx; > + merger_context_ref(merger->ctx); > + merger_heap_create(&merger->heap); > + merger->nodes_count = 0; > + merger->nodes = NULL; > + merger->reverse = false; > + > + return &merger->base; > +} > + > +int > +merger_set_sources(struct merger_source *base, struct merger_source **sources, > + uint32_t sources_count) > +{ > + struct merger *merger = container_of(base, struct merger, base); > + > + /* Ensure we don't leak old nodes. */ > + assert(merger->nodes_count == 0); > + assert(merger->nodes == NULL); > + > + const size_t nodes_size = > + sources_count * sizeof(struct merger_heap_node); > + struct merger_heap_node *nodes = (struct merger_heap_node *) malloc( > + nodes_size); > + if (nodes == NULL) { > + diag_set(OutOfMemory, nodes_size, "malloc", > + "merger heap nodes"); > + return -1; > + } > + > + for (uint32_t i = 0; i < sources_count; ++i) > + merger_heap_node_new(&nodes[i], sources[i]); > + > + merger->nodes_count = sources_count; > + merger->nodes = nodes; > + return 0; > +} > + > +void > +merger_set_reverse(struct merger_source *base, bool reverse) > +{ > + struct merger *merger = container_of(base, struct merger, base); > + > + merger->reverse = reverse; > +} > + > +/* Virtual methods */ > + > +static void > +merger_delete(struct merger_source *base) > +{ > + struct merger *merger = container_of(base, struct merger, base); > + > + merger_context_unref(merger->ctx); > + merger_heap_destroy(&merger->heap); > + > + for (uint32_t i = 0; i < merger->nodes_count; ++i) > + merger_heap_node_delete(&merger->nodes[i]); > + > + if (merger->nodes != NULL) > + free(merger->nodes); > + > + free(merger); > +} > + > +static int > +merger_next(struct merger_source *base, box_tuple_format_t *format, > + struct tuple **out) > +{ > + struct merger *merger = container_of(base, struct merger, base); > + > + /* > + * Fetch a first tuple for each source and add all heap > + * nodes to a merger heap. > + */ > + if (!merger->started) { > + for (uint32_t i = 0; i < merger->nodes_count; ++i) { > + struct merger_heap_node *node = &merger->nodes[i]; > + if (merger_add_heap_node(merger, node) != 0) > + return -1; > + } > + merger->started = true; > + } > + > + /* Get a next tuple. */ > + struct merger_heap_node *node = merger_heap_top(&merger->heap); > + if (node == NULL) { > + *out = NULL; > + return 0; > + } > + struct tuple *tuple = node->tuple; > + assert(tuple != NULL); > + > + /* > + * The tuples are stored in merger->ctx->format for > + * fast comparisons, but we should return tuples in a > + * requested format. > + */ > + uint32_t id_stored = tuple_format_id(merger->ctx->format); > + assert(tuple->format_id == id_stored); > + if (format == NULL) > + format = merger->ctx->format; > + uint32_t id_requested = tuple_format_id(format); > + if (id_stored != id_requested) { Tuples returned by a source must be sorted. This means that you can't pass a merger to another merger using a different key def. That is, this code is somewhat pointless. And it looks weird to me. I have a suspicion that all those relocations are going to cost us more than tuple comparisons themselves. May be, we shouldn't relocate tuples at all, just validate and forward them as they are? After all, we are heading toward having offsets of all formatted fields so if we are given a tuple (e.g. from space.select) it's likely to have all fields indexed already. > + const char *tuple_beg = tuple_data(tuple); > + const char *tuple_end = tuple_beg + tuple->bsize; > + tuple = box_tuple_new(format, tuple_beg, tuple_end); > + if (tuple == NULL) > + return -1; > + box_tuple_ref(tuple); > + /* > + * The node->tuple pointer will be rewritten below > + * and in this branch it will not be returned. So > + * we unreference it. > + */ > + box_tuple_unref(node->tuple); > + } > + > + /* > + * Note: An old node->tuple pointer will be written to > + * *out as refcounted tuple or is already unreferenced > + * above, so we don't unreference it here. > + */ > + struct merger_source *source = node->source; > + if (source->vtab->next(source, merger->ctx->format, &node->tuple) != 0) > + return -1; > + > + /* Update a heap. */ > + if (node->tuple == NULL) > + merger_heap_delete(&merger->heap, node); > + else > + merger_heap_update(&merger->heap, node); > + > + *out = tuple; > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* }}} */ > diff --git a/src/box/merger.h b/src/box/merger.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000..2323dd7d7 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/src/box/merger.h > @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@ > +#ifndef TARANTOOL_BOX_MERGER_H_INCLUDED > +#define TARANTOOL_BOX_MERGER_H_INCLUDED > +/* > + * Copyright 2010-2019, Tarantool AUTHORS, please see AUTHORS file. > + * > + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or > + * without modification, are permitted provided that the following > + * conditions are met: > + * > + * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above > + * copyright notice, this list of conditions and the > + * following disclaimer. > + * > + * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above > + * copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following > + * disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials > + * provided with the distribution. > + * > + * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY AUTHORS ``AS IS'' AND > + * ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED > + * TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR > + * A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL > + * AUTHORS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, > + * INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL > + * DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF > + * SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR > + * BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF > + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT > + * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF > + * THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF > + * SUCH DAMAGE. > + */ > + > +#include <stdbool.h> > +#include <stdint.h> > + > +#if defined(__cplusplus) > +extern "C" { > +#endif /* defined(__cplusplus) */ > + > +/* {{{ Structures */ > + > +struct tuple; > +struct key_def; > +struct tuple_format; > +typedef struct tuple_format box_tuple_format_t; > + > +struct merger_source; > +struct merger_context; > + > +struct merger_source_vtab { > + /** > + * Free a merger source. > + * > + * Don't call it directly, use merger_source_unref() > + * instead. > + */ > + void (*delete)(struct merger_source *base); 'delete' is a reserved word in C++ IMO better avoid using it in a header file - it may be included in a C++ file one day. > + /** > + * Get a next tuple (refcounted) from a source. > + * > + * When format is NULL it means that it does not matter > + * for a caller in which format a tuple will be. > + * > + * Return 0 when successfully fetched a tuple or NULL. In > + * case of an error set a diag and return -1. > + */ > + int (*next)(struct merger_source *base, box_tuple_format_t *format, > + struct tuple **out); Let's please add inline merge_source_next wrapper function. It'd look neater than calling src->vtab->next directly. Also, 'format' looks more like a parameter of a source to me, not an argument of this function. What about moving 'format' to merge_source struct? > +}; > + > +/** > + * Base (abstract) structure to represent a merger source. > + * > + * The structure does not hold any resources. > + */ > +struct merger_source { > + /* Source-specific methods. */ > + struct merger_source_vtab *vtab; Should be const. > + /* Reference counter. */ > + int refs; > +}; > + > +/** > + * Holds immutable parameters of a merger. > + */ > +struct merger_context { > + struct key_def *key_def; > + box_tuple_format_t *format; > + /* Reference counter. */ > + int refs; > +}; > + > +/* }}} */ > + > +/* {{{ Create, delete, ref, unref a source and a context */ > + > +/** > + * Increment a merger source reference counter. > + */ > +void > +merger_source_ref(struct merger_source *source); > + > +/** > + * Decrement a merger source reference counter. When it has > + * reached zero, free the source (call delete() virtual method). > + */ > +void > +merger_source_unref(struct merger_source *source); > + > +/** > + * Initialize a base merger source structure. > + */ > +void > +merger_source_new(struct merger_source *source, > + struct merger_source_vtab *vtab); > + > +/** > + * Free a merger context. > + */ > +void > +merger_context_delete(struct merger_context *ctx); Why make it public? AFAICS you only need merger_context_unref outside. > + > +/** > + * Increment a merger context reference counter. > + */ > +void > +merger_context_ref(struct merger_context *ctx); > + > +/** > + * Decrement a merger context reference counter. When it has > + * reached zero, free the context. > + */ > +void > +merger_context_unref(struct merger_context *ctx); > + > +/** > + * Create a new merger context. > + * > + * A returned merger context is NOT reference counted. It is refernece counted. It just has the reference counter set to 0. Anyway, why not set it to 1 right away - the caller will do that in any case, no? > + * > + * Return NULL and set a diag in case of an error. > + */ > +struct merger_context * > +merger_context_new(const struct key_def *key_def); > + > +/* }}} */ > + > +/* {{{ Merger */ > + > +/** > + * Create a new merger w/o sources. > + * > + * Return NULL and set a diag in case of an error. > + */ > +struct merger_source * > +merger_new(struct merger_context *ctx); > + > +/** > + * Set sources for a merger. > + * > + * Return 0 at success. Return -1 at an error and set a diag. > + */ > +int > +merger_set_sources(struct merger_source *base, struct merger_source **sources, > + uint32_t sources_count); source_count :) > + > +/** > + * Set reverse flag for a merger. > + */ > +void > +merger_set_reverse(struct merger_source *base, bool reverse); I'd rather pass all the arguments directly to the constructor, the way you do it in Lua, otherwise unsettling questions might arise: what happens if I call set_sources or set_reverse after using the merger? can I use a merger without calling those functions? > + > +/* }}} */ > + > +#if defined(__cplusplus) > +} /* extern "C" */ > +#endif /* defined(__cplusplus) */ > + > +#endif /* TARANTOOL_BOX_MERGER_H_INCLUDED */ > diff --git a/test/unit/merger.test.c b/test/unit/merger.test.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000..0a25d8f04 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/test/unit/merger.test.c > @@ -0,0 +1,301 @@ > +#include "unit.h" /* plan, header, footer, is, ok */ > +#include "memory.h" /* memory_init() */ > +#include "fiber.h" /* fiber_init() */ > +#include "box/tuple.h" /* tuple_init(), box_tuple_*(), > + tuple_*() */ > +#include "box/tuple_format.h" /* box_tuple_format_default(), > + tuple_format_id() */ > +#include "box/key_def.h" /* key_def_new(), > + key_def_delete() */ > +#include "box/merger.h" /* merger_*() */ > + > +/* {{{ Array merger source */ > + > +struct merger_source_array { > + struct merger_source base; > + uint32_t tuples_count; > + struct tuple **tuples; > + uint32_t cur; > +}; > + > +/* Virtual methods declarations */ > + > +static void > +merger_source_array_delete(struct merger_source *base); > +static int > +merger_source_array_next(struct merger_source *base, box_tuple_format_t *format, > + struct tuple **out); > + > +/* Non-virtual methods */ > + > +static struct merger_source * > +merger_source_array_new(bool even) > +{ > + static struct merger_source_vtab merger_source_array_vtab = { > + .delete = merger_source_array_delete, > + .next = merger_source_array_next, > + }; > + > + struct merger_source_array *source = > + (struct merger_source_array *) malloc( > + sizeof(struct merger_source_array)); > + assert(source != NULL); > + > + merger_source_new(&source->base, &merger_source_array_vtab); > + > + uint32_t tuple_size = 2; > + const uint32_t tuples_count = 2; > + /* {1}, {3} */ > + static const char *data_odd[] = {"\x91\x01", "\x91\x03"}; You might want to use mp_format here. > + /* {2}, {4} */ > + static const char *data_even[] = {"\x91\x02", "\x91\x04"}; > + const char **data = even ? data_even : data_odd; > + source->tuples = (struct tuple **) malloc( > + tuples_count * sizeof(struct tuple *)); > + assert(source->tuples != NULL); > + box_tuple_format_t *format = box_tuple_format_default(); > + for (uint32_t i = 0; i < tuples_count; ++i) { > + const char *end = data[i] + tuple_size; > + source->tuples[i] = box_tuple_new(format, data[i], end); > + box_tuple_ref(source->tuples[i]); > + } > + source->tuples_count = tuples_count; > + source->cur = 0; > + > + return &source->base; > +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-30 15:34 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-04-10 15:21 [PATCH v3 0/7] Merger Alexander Turenko 2019-04-10 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] Add luaL_iscallable with support of cdata metatype Alexander Turenko 2019-04-18 17:30 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2019-04-30 12:45 ` Vladimir Davydov 2019-04-10 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] Add functions to ease using Lua iterators from C Alexander Turenko 2019-04-18 17:31 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2019-04-30 12:46 ` Vladimir Davydov 2019-04-10 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] lua: optimize creation of a tuple from a tuple Alexander Turenko 2019-04-18 17:32 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2019-04-30 12:50 ` Vladimir Davydov 2019-04-30 15:07 ` Alexander Turenko 2019-04-10 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] lua: add non-recursive msgpack decoding functions Alexander Turenko 2019-04-18 17:35 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2019-04-18 18:30 ` Alexander Turenko 2019-04-18 18:33 ` Konstantin Osipov 2019-04-18 18:44 ` Alexander Turenko 2019-04-30 13:03 ` Vladimir Davydov 2019-04-30 18:38 ` Alexander Turenko 2019-04-10 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] net.box: add skip_header option to use with buffer Alexander Turenko 2019-04-18 17:37 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2019-04-18 18:39 ` Alexander Turenko 2019-04-30 13:16 ` Vladimir Davydov 2019-04-30 18:39 ` Alexander Turenko 2019-04-10 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] Add merger for tuples streams (C part) Alexander Turenko 2019-04-25 11:43 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2019-04-25 13:32 ` Alexander Turenko 2019-04-25 13:45 ` Konstantin Osipov 2019-04-25 15:32 ` [tarantool-patches] " Alexander Turenko 2019-04-25 16:42 ` Konstantin Osipov 2019-04-30 15:34 ` Vladimir Davydov [this message] 2019-05-07 22:14 ` Alexander Turenko 2019-04-10 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] Add merger for tuple streams (Lua part) Alexander Turenko 2019-04-25 11:46 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2019-04-25 12:53 ` Alexander Turenko 2019-04-25 13:30 ` Konstantin Osipov 2019-04-30 17:37 ` Vladimir Davydov 2019-04-30 21:09 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2019-05-02 9:48 ` Vladimir Davydov 2019-05-07 22:14 ` Alexander Turenko
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190430153415.beufsnt2txjhkkhc@esperanza \ --to=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \ --cc=alexander.turenko@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] Add merger for tuples streams (C part)' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox