From: Konstantin Osipov <kostja.osipov@gmail.com> To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org Cc: Georgy Kirichenko <georgy@tarantool.org> Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 04/10] Get rid of autocommit from a txn structure Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 22:07:18 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190424190718.GD21344@atlas> (raw) In-Reply-To: <05824da8674e6330f2c54833277d139846c235d0.1555677159.git.georgy@tarantool.org> * Georgy Kirichenko <georgy@tarantool.org> [19/04/19 19:59]: > box_process_rw(struct request *request, struct space *space, > struct tuple **result) > { > + struct tuple *tuple = NULL; > + struct txn *txn = in_txn(); > + bool autocommit = txn == NULL; > + if (txn == NULL && (txn = txn_begin()) == NULL) nit: why not use if (autocommit && (txn == txn_begin()) == NULL) instead > + return -1; > assert(iproto_type_is_dml(request->type)); > rmean_collect(rmean_box, request->type, 1); > if (access_check_space(space, PRIV_W) != 0) > - return -1; > - struct txn *txn = txn_begin_stmt(space); > - if (txn == NULL) > - return -1; > - struct tuple *tuple; > + goto fail; > + if (txn_begin_stmt(space) == NULL) > + goto fail; I guess txn_begin_stmt can as well receive txn explicitly now, since we always fetch fiber->txn before calling txn_begin_stmt(). This will save us one fiber key fetch. > if (space_execute_dml(space, txn, request, &tuple) != 0) { > txn_rollback_stmt(); > - return -1; > + goto fail; > } > - if (result == NULL) > - return txn_commit_stmt(txn, request); > - *result = tuple; > - if (tuple == NULL) > - return txn_commit_stmt(txn, request); > /* > * Pin the tuple locally before the commit, > * otherwise it may go away during yield in > * when WAL is written in autocommit mode. > */ > - tuple_ref(tuple); > - int rc = txn_commit_stmt(txn, request); > - if (rc == 0) > + if (tuple != NULL) > + tuple_ref(tuple); > + > + if (result != NULL) > + *result = tuple; > + > + if (txn_commit_stmt(txn, request) != 0) > + goto fail; > + if (autocommit) { > + if (txn_commit(txn) != 0) > + goto fail; > + fiber_gc(); > + } > + > + if (tuple != NULL && result != NULL) { > tuple_bless(tuple); > - tuple_unref(tuple); The code here now looks quite messy. I think it would be easier to read if we split it between if (autocommit) ... else ... branches: if (tuple == NULL) { return is_autocommit ? txn_commit_stmt() : txn_commit(); } tuple_ref(tuple); if (txn_commit_stmt(txn, request)) goto fail; if (is_autocommit) if (txn_commit()) goto fail; fiber_gc(); } tuple_bless(tuple); if (result) *result = tuple; tuple_unref(tuple); return 0; The patch is generally looking good, please fix the above nits and it will be good to go. -- Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia, +7 903 626 22 32 http://tarantool.io - www.twitter.com/kostja_osipov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-24 19:07 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-04-19 12:43 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 00/10] Transaction refactoring Georgy Kirichenko 2019-04-19 12:43 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 01/10] Introduce a txn memory region Georgy Kirichenko 2019-04-24 18:20 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2019-04-19 12:43 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 02/10] Alloc journal entry on " Georgy Kirichenko 2019-04-24 18:21 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2019-04-19 12:43 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 03/10] Encode a dml statement to a transaction " Georgy Kirichenko 2019-04-24 18:28 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2019-04-19 12:44 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 04/10] Get rid of autocommit from a txn structure Georgy Kirichenko 2019-04-24 19:07 ` Konstantin Osipov [this message] 2019-04-19 12:44 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 05/10] Get rid of fiber_gc from txn_rollback Georgy Kirichenko 2019-04-24 19:12 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2019-04-19 12:44 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 06/10] Require for txn in case of txn_begin_stmt/txn_rollback_stmt Georgy Kirichenko 2019-04-24 19:13 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2019-04-19 12:44 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 07/10] Remove fiber from a journal_entry structure Georgy Kirichenko 2019-04-24 19:16 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2019-04-19 12:44 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 08/10] Use mempool to alloc wal messages Georgy Kirichenko 2019-04-24 19:18 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2019-04-19 12:44 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 09/10] Enable asyncronous wal writes Georgy Kirichenko 2019-04-24 19:19 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2019-04-19 12:44 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 10/10] Introduce asynchronous txn commit Georgy Kirichenko 2019-04-24 19:20 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190424190718.GD21344@atlas \ --to=kostja.osipov@gmail.com \ --cc=georgy@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \ --subject='[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 04/10] Get rid of autocommit from a txn structure' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox