From: Konstantin Osipov <kostja.osipov@gmail.com>
To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org
Cc: Georgy Kirichenko <georgy@tarantool.org>
Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 04/10] Get rid of autocommit from a txn structure
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 22:07:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190424190718.GD21344@atlas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05824da8674e6330f2c54833277d139846c235d0.1555677159.git.georgy@tarantool.org>
* Georgy Kirichenko <georgy@tarantool.org> [19/04/19 19:59]:
> box_process_rw(struct request *request, struct space *space,
> struct tuple **result)
> {
> + struct tuple *tuple = NULL;
> + struct txn *txn = in_txn();
> + bool autocommit = txn == NULL;
> + if (txn == NULL && (txn = txn_begin()) == NULL)
nit: why not use if (autocommit && (txn == txn_begin()) == NULL)
instead
> + return -1;
> assert(iproto_type_is_dml(request->type));
> rmean_collect(rmean_box, request->type, 1);
> if (access_check_space(space, PRIV_W) != 0)
> - return -1;
> - struct txn *txn = txn_begin_stmt(space);
> - if (txn == NULL)
> - return -1;
> - struct tuple *tuple;
> + goto fail;
> + if (txn_begin_stmt(space) == NULL)
> + goto fail;
I guess txn_begin_stmt can as well receive txn explicitly now,
since we always fetch fiber->txn before calling txn_begin_stmt().
This will save us one fiber key fetch.
> if (space_execute_dml(space, txn, request, &tuple) != 0) {
> txn_rollback_stmt();
> - return -1;
> + goto fail;
> }
> - if (result == NULL)
> - return txn_commit_stmt(txn, request);
> - *result = tuple;
> - if (tuple == NULL)
> - return txn_commit_stmt(txn, request);
> /*
> * Pin the tuple locally before the commit,
> * otherwise it may go away during yield in
> * when WAL is written in autocommit mode.
> */
> - tuple_ref(tuple);
> - int rc = txn_commit_stmt(txn, request);
> - if (rc == 0)
> + if (tuple != NULL)
> + tuple_ref(tuple);
> +
> + if (result != NULL)
> + *result = tuple;
> +
> + if (txn_commit_stmt(txn, request) != 0)
> + goto fail;
> + if (autocommit) {
> + if (txn_commit(txn) != 0)
> + goto fail;
> + fiber_gc();
> + }
> +
> + if (tuple != NULL && result != NULL) {
> tuple_bless(tuple);
> - tuple_unref(tuple);
The code here now looks quite messy. I think it would be easier to
read if we split it between if (autocommit) ... else ... branches:
if (tuple == NULL) {
return is_autocommit ? txn_commit_stmt() : txn_commit();
}
tuple_ref(tuple);
if (txn_commit_stmt(txn, request))
goto fail;
if (is_autocommit)
if (txn_commit())
goto fail;
fiber_gc();
}
tuple_bless(tuple);
if (result)
*result = tuple;
tuple_unref(tuple);
return 0;
The patch is generally looking good, please fix the above nits and
it will be good to go.
--
Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia, +7 903 626 22 32
http://tarantool.io - www.twitter.com/kostja_osipov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-24 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-19 12:43 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 00/10] Transaction refactoring Georgy Kirichenko
2019-04-19 12:43 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 01/10] Introduce a txn memory region Georgy Kirichenko
2019-04-24 18:20 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2019-04-19 12:43 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 02/10] Alloc journal entry on " Georgy Kirichenko
2019-04-24 18:21 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2019-04-19 12:43 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 03/10] Encode a dml statement to a transaction " Georgy Kirichenko
2019-04-24 18:28 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2019-04-19 12:44 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 04/10] Get rid of autocommit from a txn structure Georgy Kirichenko
2019-04-24 19:07 ` Konstantin Osipov [this message]
2019-04-19 12:44 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 05/10] Get rid of fiber_gc from txn_rollback Georgy Kirichenko
2019-04-24 19:12 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2019-04-19 12:44 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 06/10] Require for txn in case of txn_begin_stmt/txn_rollback_stmt Georgy Kirichenko
2019-04-24 19:13 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2019-04-19 12:44 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 07/10] Remove fiber from a journal_entry structure Georgy Kirichenko
2019-04-24 19:16 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2019-04-19 12:44 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 08/10] Use mempool to alloc wal messages Georgy Kirichenko
2019-04-24 19:18 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2019-04-19 12:44 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 09/10] Enable asyncronous wal writes Georgy Kirichenko
2019-04-24 19:19 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2019-04-19 12:44 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 10/10] Introduce asynchronous txn commit Georgy Kirichenko
2019-04-24 19:20 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190424190718.GD21344@atlas \
--to=kostja.osipov@gmail.com \
--cc=georgy@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \
--subject='[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 04/10] Get rid of autocommit from a txn structure' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox