From: Konstantin Osipov <kostja.osipov@gmail.com> To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org Cc: "n.pettik" <korablev@tarantool.org> Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 1/2] sql: derive collation for built-in functions Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:04:58 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190311080458.GE3101@chai> (raw) In-Reply-To: <cc7727e6-2421-a417-35c7-beeea01cd6a4@tarantool.org> * Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> [19/03/07 17:44]: > It contradicts with your way of collation return. If PSQL states > that collation is a part of string-like type, then it is > possible to implement a function doing something like this: > > function my_func() > if (rand() % 2 == 0) then > return 'abc' collate 'unicode_ci'; > return 'abc' collate 'unicode'; > end; > > (I do not know PSQL syntax - the code above is pseudo- ). It would be impossible in SQL/PSM, since a function return value is strictly typed, so there would be a type error or automatic coercion to return type collation. > As I see, now we have no runtime defined collations at all - > all of them are known during compilation. Struct Mem, storing > function return value, even has no collation member. I guess, > we can not implement runtime collations now. -- Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia, +7 903 626 22 32 http://tarantool.io - www.twitter.com/kostja_osipov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-11 8:05 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-02-21 18:01 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/2] Add collation to built-in funcs and fix HAVING clause with aggregate Nikita Pettik 2019-02-21 18:01 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/2] sql: derive collation for built-in functions Nikita Pettik 2019-02-25 12:58 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-02-25 18:32 ` n.pettik 2019-03-07 14:40 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-03-11 8:04 ` Konstantin Osipov [this message] 2019-02-21 18:01 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/2] sql: fix code generation for aggregate in HAVING clause Nikita Pettik 2019-02-25 12:58 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-02-25 18:33 ` n.pettik 2019-03-04 12:14 ` n.pettik 2019-03-04 12:52 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-03-07 14:40 ` [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add collation to built-in funcs and fix HAVING clause with aggregate Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-03-11 15:49 ` Kirill Yukhin
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190311080458.GE3101@chai \ --to=kostja.osipov@gmail.com \ --cc=korablev@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \ --subject='[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 1/2] sql: derive collation for built-in functions' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox