Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
To: Kirill Shcherbatov <kshcherbatov@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] box: introduce hint option for memtx tree index
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 19:12:06 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190211161206.jtu2narfch42v3xm@esperanza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d0e74f975be244ea05663275e3f9835e7400e010.1549367041.git.kshcherbatov@tarantool.org>

On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 02:58:39PM +0300, Kirill Shcherbatov wrote:
> If an index has certain option, a compare hint must be calculated
> and stored within bps_tree along with struct tuple pointer. This
> hint must be used for tuple precomparison in order to avoid memory
> fetching and significantly improve tree performance.
> 
> Such a hinted tree will cost twice amount of memory - 20 byte per
> tuple on average.
> Enabled hint option improve performance on average by 15%; Select
> operations are significantly accelerated (there are scenarios in
> which the difference reaches 200-250%).
> 
> Test set from original @alyapunov patch.
> 
> Needed for #3961
> ---
>  src/box/index_def.c                 |   2 +
>  src/box/index_def.h                 |   6 +
>  src/box/lua/schema.lua              |  12 ++
>  src/box/lua/space.cc                |   5 +
>  src/box/memtx_tree.c                | 192 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  src/box/memtx_tree_impl.h           |   2 +-
>  test/box/tree_pk.result             | 220 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  test/box/tree_pk.test.lua           |  88 +++++++++++
>  test/box/tree_pk_multipart.result   | 155 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  test/box/tree_pk_multipart.test.lua |  65 ++++++++
>  10 files changed, 745 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/box/index_def.c b/src/box/index_def.c
> index c52aa38d1..4d3fadc6e 100644
> --- a/src/box/index_def.c
> +++ b/src/box/index_def.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ const struct index_opts index_opts_default = {
>  	/* .bloom_fpr           = */ 0.05,
>  	/* .lsn                 = */ 0,
>  	/* .stat                = */ NULL,
> +	/* .hint                = */ false,
>  };
>  
>  const struct opt_def index_opts_reg[] = {
> @@ -62,6 +63,7 @@ const struct opt_def index_opts_reg[] = {
>  	OPT_DEF("run_size_ratio", OPT_FLOAT, struct index_opts, run_size_ratio),
>  	OPT_DEF("bloom_fpr", OPT_FLOAT, struct index_opts, bloom_fpr),
>  	OPT_DEF("lsn", OPT_INT64, struct index_opts, lsn),
> +	OPT_DEF("hint", OPT_BOOL, struct index_opts, hint),
>  	OPT_END,
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/src/box/index_def.h b/src/box/index_def.h
> index 7717ecd64..74814bef5 100644
> --- a/src/box/index_def.h
> +++ b/src/box/index_def.h
> @@ -157,6 +157,10 @@ struct index_opts {
>  	 * LSN from the time of index creation.
>  	 */
>  	int64_t lsn;
> +	/**
> +	 * Use hint optimization for tree index.
> +	 */
> +	bool hint;

Hints should be enabled unconditionally if possible. Please don't
introduce a new index option.

The tests won't be necessary then, I guess.

> diff --git a/src/box/memtx_tree.c b/src/box/memtx_tree.c
> index 6b22883c2..426a11262 100644
> --- a/src/box/memtx_tree.c
> +++ b/src/box/memtx_tree.c
> @@ -79,8 +79,198 @@ struct memtx_tuple_tree_key_data {
>  
>  /* }}} */
>  
> +/* {{{ Memtx hinted and hint_only tree class. *******************/

Please add a comment somewhere explaining what's the difference.

I also have some concerns about struct/function names, but we'll talk
about them later, when you make patch 2 review-able.

> +
> +/**
> + * Struct that is used as a key in BPS tree definition in
> + * metmx_hint_only_tree and metmx_hinted_tree.
> +*/
> +struct memtx_hinted_tree_key_data {
> +	/** Sequence of msgpacked search fields. */
> +	const char *key;
> +	/** Number of msgpacked search fields. */
> +	uint32_t part_count;
> +	/**
> +	 * Compare hint. Is calculated automatically on 'set'
> +	 * operation with memtx_hinted_tree_key_data_set().
> +	 */
> +	uint64_t hint;
> +};

      reply	other threads:[~2019-02-11 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-05 11:58 [PATCH v1 0/4] " Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-02-05 11:58 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] lib: introduce BPS_TREE_EQUAL custom comparator Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-02-11 15:46   ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-02-05 11:58 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] box: rework memtx_tree class to be reusable Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-02-11 15:49   ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-02-05 11:58 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] box: introduce tuple compare hint Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-02-11 15:57   ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-02-05 11:58 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] box: introduce hint option for memtx tree index Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-02-11 16:12   ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190211161206.jtu2narfch42v3xm@esperanza \
    --to=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kshcherbatov@tarantool.org \
    --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] box: introduce hint option for memtx tree index' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox