Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
To: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@tarantool.org>
Cc: Serge Petrenko <sergepetrenko@tarantool.org>,
	tarantool-patches@freelists.org
Subject: Re: [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 1/3] box: get rid of atexit() for calling cleanup routine
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 15:56:20 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181227125620.2o7xgjts5pmljesm@esperanza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181227125058.GH18166@chai>

On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 03:50:58PM +0300, Konstantin Osipov wrote:
> * Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> [18/12/27 15:45]:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 04:24:38PM +0300, Serge Petrenko wrote:
> > > Move a call to tarantool_free() to the end of main().
> > > Also instead of breaking the event loop directly when processing a
> > > signal start a fiber which can do some work before event loop break and
> > > then break the event loop (this will be helpful when on_shutdown
> > > triggers are implemented to run them while ev loop active).
> > > Only wal_thread_stop() is left in atexit() to make sure we close the
> > > journal in case the user exits by typing os.exit() to the console.
> > 
> > I don't understand why you need to do it in the scope of the issue
> > you're intending to fix. You can start a fiber from SITERM/SIGINT signal
> > handler and run on_shutdown triggers from it without atexit rework,
> > right?
> 
> I asked Sergey to refactor our atexit machinery. I want atexit
> handlers to be able to run the event loop, all such handlers, not
> just the exit trigger.

But this isn't what this patch does - it just moves some code from
atexit() to the end of main, after the event loop is stopped.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-27 12:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-11 13:24 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 0/3] box: implement on_shutdown triggers Serge Petrenko
2018-12-11 13:24 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 1/3] box: get rid of atexit() for calling cleanup routine Serge Petrenko
2018-12-27 12:43   ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-12-27 12:50     ` Konstantin Osipov
2018-12-27 12:56       ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
2018-12-28  7:43         ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2018-12-28  7:58           ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-12-29 13:54             ` Serge Petrenko
2018-12-11 13:24 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 2/3] box: implement on_shutdown triggers Serge Petrenko
2018-12-27 13:11   ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-12-11 13:24 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 3/3] box: introduce on_shutdown triggers to lua Serge Petrenko
2018-12-27 13:14   ` Vladimir Davydov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181227125620.2o7xgjts5pmljesm@esperanza \
    --to=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kostja@tarantool.org \
    --cc=sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \
    --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \
    --subject='Re: [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 1/3] box: get rid of atexit() for calling cleanup routine' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox