From: Alexander Turenko <alexander.turenko@tarantool.org> To: Sergei Voronezhskii <sergw@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org, Kirill Yukhin <kyukhin@tarantool.org>, Georgy Kirichenko <georgy@tarantool.org> Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH] test: skip test backtrace if no libunwind support Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 07:03:16 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20181126040315.akdyajokz7xsnx4w@tkn_work_nb> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20181123100732.11180-1-sergw@tarantool.org> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 01:07:32PM +0300, Sergei Voronezhskii wrote: > Fixes: #3824 > --- > BASE: 1.10-features > BUILD: https://travis-ci.org/tarantool/tarantool/builds/458722725 > BRANCH: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/sergw/fix-fiber-test-if-no-libunwind > test/app/fiber.result | 4 +++- > test/app/fiber.test.lua | 4 +++- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/test/app/fiber.test.lua b/test/app/fiber.test.lua > index b9d82ef05..e3165edaf 100644 > --- a/test/app/fiber.test.lua > +++ b/test/app/fiber.test.lua > @@ -340,7 +340,9 @@ function sf3() sf2() end > f1 = fiber.create(sf3) > > info = fiber.info() > -backtrace = info[f1:id()].backtrace > +-- if compibled without libunwind support, need to return mock object here compibled -> compiled > +-- to skip this test, see #3824 > +backtrace = info[f1:id()].backtrace or {{L = 'sf1'}, {L = 'loop'}, {L = 'sf3'}} > bt_str = '' > for _, b in pairs(backtrace) do bt_str = bt_str .. (b['L'] or '') end > bt_str:find('sf1') ~= nil We can check require('tarantool').build.options:match('-DENABLE_BACKTRACE=([^ ]+)'):upper() against 1, ON, YES, TRUE, Y, or a non-zero number (see [1]) (note that default is enabled) and disable the test when backtraces are disabled (you can wrap the test into a function). Your approach is simpler, but it will accept lack of backtrace for a build with enabled backtraces. Hovewer it looks okay for me, because unlikely to occur. Georgy, what do you think? [1]: https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/command/if.html WBR, Alexander Turenko.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-26 4:03 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-11-23 10:07 [tarantool-patches] " Sergei Voronezhskii 2018-11-26 4:03 ` Alexander Turenko [this message] 2018-11-29 12:36 ` Vladimir Davydov
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20181126040315.akdyajokz7xsnx4w@tkn_work_nb \ --to=alexander.turenko@tarantool.org \ --cc=georgy@tarantool.org \ --cc=kyukhin@tarantool.org \ --cc=sergw@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \ --subject='[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH] test: skip test backtrace if no libunwind support' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox