Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Turenko <alexander.turenko@tarantool.org>
To: Sergei Voronezhskii <sergw@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org,
	Kirill Yukhin <kyukhin@tarantool.org>,
	Georgy Kirichenko <georgy@tarantool.org>
Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH] test: skip test backtrace if no libunwind support
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 07:03:16 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181126040315.akdyajokz7xsnx4w@tkn_work_nb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181123100732.11180-1-sergw@tarantool.org>

On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 01:07:32PM +0300, Sergei Voronezhskii wrote:
> Fixes: #3824
> ---
> BASE: 1.10-features
> BUILD: https://travis-ci.org/tarantool/tarantool/builds/458722725
> BRANCH: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/sergw/fix-fiber-test-if-no-libunwind
>  test/app/fiber.result   | 4 +++-
>  test/app/fiber.test.lua | 4 +++-
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

> diff --git a/test/app/fiber.test.lua b/test/app/fiber.test.lua
> index b9d82ef05..e3165edaf 100644
> --- a/test/app/fiber.test.lua
> +++ b/test/app/fiber.test.lua
> @@ -340,7 +340,9 @@ function sf3() sf2() end
>  f1 = fiber.create(sf3)
>  
>  info = fiber.info()
> -backtrace = info[f1:id()].backtrace
> +-- if compibled without libunwind support, need to return mock object here

compibled -> compiled

> +-- to skip this test, see #3824
> +backtrace = info[f1:id()].backtrace or {{L = 'sf1'}, {L = 'loop'}, {L = 'sf3'}}
>  bt_str = ''
>  for _, b in pairs(backtrace) do bt_str = bt_str .. (b['L'] or '') end
>  bt_str:find('sf1') ~= nil

We can check

require('tarantool').build.options:match('-DENABLE_BACKTRACE=([^ ]+)'):upper()

against 1, ON, YES, TRUE, Y, or a non-zero number (see [1]) (note that
default is enabled) and disable the test when backtraces are disabled
(you can wrap the test into a function).

Your approach is simpler, but it will accept lack of backtrace for a
build with enabled backtraces. Hovewer it looks okay for me, because
unlikely to occur.

Georgy, what do you think?

[1]: https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/command/if.html

WBR, Alexander Turenko.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-26  4:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-23 10:07 [tarantool-patches] " Sergei Voronezhskii
2018-11-26  4:03 ` Alexander Turenko [this message]
2018-11-29 12:36 ` Vladimir Davydov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181126040315.akdyajokz7xsnx4w@tkn_work_nb \
    --to=alexander.turenko@tarantool.org \
    --cc=georgy@tarantool.org \
    --cc=kyukhin@tarantool.org \
    --cc=sergw@tarantool.org \
    --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \
    --subject='[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH] test: skip test backtrace if no libunwind support' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox