From: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@tarantool.org>
To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org
Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 3/3] vinyl: force major compaction if there are too many DELETEs
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:03:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181023090346.GC17670@chai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e898deb1572c91ed37ab2a1508cbe5c7a92ae1e2.1540057300.git.vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
* Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> [18/10/20 23:19]:
> Even a perfectly shaped LSM tree can accumulate a huge number of DELETE
> statements over time in case indexed fields are frequently updated. This
> can significantly increase read and space amplification, especially for
> secondary indexes.
>
> One way to deal with it is to propagate read amplification back to the
> scheduler so that it can raise compaction priority accordingly. Although
> this would probably make sense, it wouldn't be enough, because it
> wouldn't deal with space amplification growth in case the workload is
> write-mostly.
I disagree with the reasoning. We need a weighted norm of all
parameters of the lsm tree when calculating compaction priority.
It's pretty easy to do. Imagine it's a multi-dimensional space,
where dimensions are write amplification, read
amplification, space amplification. We need to scale each
dimension and calculated a distance to the center of the space,
which stands for a perfectly shaped lsm.
In any case reduction of read amplification and space amplification
address independent concerns: we need to ensure that space
amplification is within boundaries to not run out of disk space.
--
Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia, +7 903 626 22 32
http://tarantool.io - www.twitter.com/kostja_osipov
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-23 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-20 18:23 [PATCH 0/3] Force compaction if there " Vladimir Davydov
2018-10-20 18:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] vinyl: remove useless local var from vy_range_update_compact_priority Vladimir Davydov
2018-10-23 8:51 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2018-10-24 11:19 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-10-20 18:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] vinyl: account disk statements of each type Vladimir Davydov
2018-10-23 8:58 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2018-10-24 11:19 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-10-20 18:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] vinyl: force major compaction if there are too many DELETEs Vladimir Davydov
2018-10-23 9:03 ` Konstantin Osipov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181023090346.GC17670@chai \
--to=kostja@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \
--subject='[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 3/3] vinyl: force major compaction if there are too many DELETEs' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox