From: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@tarantool.org>
To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org
Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 2/3] Proper unwind for currently executing fiber
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 20:36:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180926173625.GO30528@chai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14423179.bJO8PXla9P@home.lan>
* Georgy Kirichenko <georgy@tarantool.org> [18/09/26 10:46]:
> On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 2:34:02 AM MSK Konstantin Osipov wrote:
> > * Georgy Kirichenko <georgy@tarantool.org> [18/09/22 00:21]:
> > > A fiber's coro context stores execution state for a corresponding
> > > already yielded fiber. If fiber is on the execution then it hasn't
> > > valid stored coro state and might be backtraced without a special unwind
> > > context builder.
> >
> > I did not understand what's going on from the comment. I assume
> > this is an optimization, in which you try to avoid re-fetching the
> > registers in some cases?
> >
> > Please clarify.
> >
> > > --
>
> Each yielded fiber has a preserved coro state stored in a corresponding
> variable however an executing fiber has a volatile state placed in CPU
> registers (stack pointer, instruction pointer and non-volatile registers) and
> corresponding context-storing variable value is invalid.
> For already yielded fiber we use a special asm-written handler to make a
> temporary switch to the preserved state and capture executing context what is
> not needed for executing fiber.
> After the patch for the executing fiber NULL is passed to the backtrace
> function as coro context and then backtrace function could decide should it
> use special context-switching handler or might just use unw_getcontext from
> the unwind library.
this is more clear, please add to the source code as a comment.
ok to push.
--
Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia, +7 903 626 22 32
http://tarantool.io - www.twitter.com/kostja_osipov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-26 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-21 13:20 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/3] Dump lua frames for a fiber traceback Georgy Kirichenko
2018-09-21 13:20 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/3] Set a lua state for the main fiber too Georgy Kirichenko
2018-09-25 23:27 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2018-10-05 15:04 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladimir Davydov
2018-09-21 13:20 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/3] Proper unwind for currently executing fiber Georgy Kirichenko
2018-09-25 23:34 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2018-09-26 6:57 ` Georgy Kirichenko
2018-09-26 17:36 ` Konstantin Osipov [this message]
2018-10-04 7:44 ` [tarantool-patches] " Georgy Kirichenko
2018-10-04 22:27 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2018-10-05 15:09 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladimir Davydov
2018-09-21 13:20 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 3/3] Show names of Lua functions in backtraces Georgy Kirichenko
2018-09-25 23:38 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2018-10-04 7:55 ` [tarantool-patches] " Georgy Kirichenko
2018-10-04 22:28 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2018-10-05 17:49 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladimir Davydov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180926173625.GO30528@chai \
--to=kostja@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \
--subject='[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 2/3] Proper unwind for currently executing fiber' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox