Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Turenko <alexander.turenko@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] socket: prevent recvfrom from returning garbage
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:55:00 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180824135500.pplinofqzzetwutd@esperanza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180824134441.nlb3fe2crb6dljoo@tkn_work_nb>

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 04:44:41PM +0300, Alexander Turenko wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 04:07:48PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 05:47:39AM +0300, Alexander Turenko wrote:
> > > In C recvfrom function sets addrlen parameter to zero when called on TCP
> > > socket (at least on Linux). The src_addr parameter can contain garbage
> > > in the case, so we should not dereference it.
> > > 
> > > Before this commit socket:recvfrom() can return 'from' table with only
> > > family field (don't sure why, but addr->sa_family often contain PF_INET
> > > value in my case) or return nil depending on the garbage at the address.
> > > Now it always return nil.
> > > ---
> > >  src/lua/socket.c | 5 +++++
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > Could you please add a test case?
> 
> Added in the previous commit ('case: recvfrom truncate the message with
> tcp'). The main purpose of the test case is another, but when added I
> found the flakiness ('from' could be {family = 'AF_INET'} or nil from
> time to time) and fixed it here.
> 
> How to better handle this? I suppose I should add a comment to the test
> case that it also test this case?

This patch is pretty straightforward and raises no questions, in
contrast to patches 1 and 2. If you equipped it with a test and
rebased on top of 1.10 (or should it be 1.9?), I'd pushed it right
away.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-24 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-24  2:47 [PATCH 0/3] *** [#3619] socket.recvfrom crops UDP packets *** Alexander Turenko
2018-08-24  2:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] socket: evaluate buffer size in recv / recvfrom Alexander Turenko
2018-08-24 14:07   ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-08-24 15:25   ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-08-27  0:08     ` Alexander Turenko
2018-08-27  9:20       ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-08-27  9:26         ` Alexander Turenko
2018-08-24  2:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] socket: don't truncate a datagram in recv/recvfrom Alexander Turenko
2018-08-24 15:24   ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-08-24  2:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] socket: prevent recvfrom from returning garbage Alexander Turenko
2018-08-24 13:07   ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-08-24 13:44     ` Alexander Turenko
2018-08-24 13:55       ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
2018-08-24 17:11   ` Vladimir Davydov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180824135500.pplinofqzzetwutd@esperanza \
    --to=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.turenko@tarantool.org \
    --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 3/3] socket: prevent recvfrom from returning garbage' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox