Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@tarantool.org>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] memtx: do not use space_vtab::commit_alter for freeing tuples
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 17:08:27 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180406140827.GD18946@atlas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92f5581b8d5b981abb14d29e411b03fad02e2607.1523019950.git.vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>

* Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> [18/04/06 16:20]:
> +
> +static void
> +memtx_index_free_tuples(struct index *index)
> +{
> -static void
> -memtx_space_prune(struct space *space)

I liked the old term (prune) more (memtx_index_prune()).
Please consider keeping it.

> index ec6f6db6..ebb54f05 100644
> --- a/src/box/memtx_space.c
> +++ b/src/box/memtx_space.c
> @@ -803,41 +803,17 @@ memtx_space_build_secondary_key(struct space *old_space,
>  			break;
>  		assert(old_tuple == NULL); /* Guaranteed by DUP_INSERT. */
>  		(void) old_tuple;
> +		/*
> +		 * All tuples stored in a memtx space must be
> +		 * referenced by the primary index.
> +		 */
> +		if (new_index->def->iid == 0)
> +			tuple_ref(tuple);

I don't understand this change. This method builds a secondary
key.
        /**                                                                     
         * Called with the new empty secondary index.                           
         * Fill the new index with data from the primary                        
         * key of the space.                                                    
         */  

How is that possible that new_index->def->iid is 0 here?

If you're re-using this static function, then please rename it.

Other than these two comments, the patch is OK to push.

-- 
Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia, +7 903 626 22 32
http://tarantool.io - www.twitter.com/kostja_osipov

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-06 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-06 13:15 [PATCH v2 0/2] alter: fix WAL error handling Vladimir Davydov
2018-04-06 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] memtx: do not use space_vtab::commit_alter for freeing tuples Vladimir Davydov
2018-04-06 14:08   ` Konstantin Osipov [this message]
2018-04-06 14:19     ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-04-06 15:29       ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-04-06 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] alter: zap space_vtab::commit_alter Vladimir Davydov
2018-04-06 14:10   ` Konstantin Osipov
2018-04-06 14:23     ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-04-06 14:28       ` Konstantin Osipov
2018-04-06 15:25         ` Vladimir Davydov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180406140827.GD18946@atlas \
    --to=kostja@tarantool.org \
    --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] memtx: do not use space_vtab::commit_alter for freeing tuples' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox