From: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
To: Nikita Pettik <korablev@tarantool.org>,
tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 08/10] box/error: clarify purpose of reference counting in struct error
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 01:24:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a94ba64-ac51-9320-12b3-433dbd9f82fa@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26c794f2c6fcca11d202f0fbf3b41b9490bf780c.1585097339.git.korablev@tarantool.org>
LGTM, you can push this out of order.
On 25/03/2020 02:43, Nikita Pettik wrote:
> ---
> src/lib/core/diag.h | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/lib/core/diag.h b/src/lib/core/diag.h
> index 675b9c6f1..665f492fa 100644
> --- a/src/lib/core/diag.h
> +++ b/src/lib/core/diag.h
> @@ -71,6 +71,15 @@ struct error {
> error_f raise;
> error_f log;
> const struct type_info *type;
> + /**
> + * Reference counting is basically required since
> + * instances of this structure are available in Lua
> + * as well (as cdata with overloaded fields and methods
> + * by the means of introspection). Thus, it may turn
> + * out that Lua's GC attempts at releasing object
> + * meanwhile it is still used in C internals or vice
> + * versa. For details see luaT_pusherror().
> + */
> int refs;
> /**
> * Errno at the moment of the error
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-30 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-25 1:42 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 00/10] Stacked diagnostics Nikita Pettik
2020-03-25 1:42 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 01/10] box: rfc for stacked diagnostic area Nikita Pettik
2020-03-25 8:27 ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-03-25 14:08 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-03-25 1:42 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 02/10] box: rename diag_add_error to diag_set_error Nikita Pettik
2020-03-25 8:27 ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-03-26 0:22 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-03-26 12:31 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-03-25 1:42 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 03/10] test: move box.error tests to box/error.test.lua Nikita Pettik
2020-03-25 8:28 ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-03-26 0:22 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-03-26 12:31 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-03-25 1:43 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 04/10] box/error: introduce box.error.set() method Nikita Pettik
2020-03-25 8:33 ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-03-25 17:41 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-03-26 0:22 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-03-26 12:31 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-03-25 1:43 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 05/10] box/error: don't set error created via box.error.new to diag Nikita Pettik
2020-03-26 16:50 ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-03-26 17:59 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-03-26 18:06 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-03-26 18:07 ` Alexander Turenko
2020-03-27 0:19 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-03-27 13:09 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-03-25 1:43 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 06/10] box: introduce stacked diagnostic area Nikita Pettik
2020-03-26 16:54 ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-03-26 18:03 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-03-26 18:08 ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-03-28 18:40 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-04-01 16:09 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-04-02 0:29 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-04-02 17:42 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-04-02 22:20 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-04-03 1:54 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-04-03 23:17 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-03-28 18:59 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-03-31 17:44 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-04-02 0:29 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-04-02 14:16 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-03-25 1:43 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 07/10] box: use stacked diagnostic area for functional indexes Nikita Pettik
2020-03-30 23:24 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-04-01 15:53 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-03-25 1:43 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 08/10] box/error: clarify purpose of reference counting in struct error Nikita Pettik
2020-03-30 23:24 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy [this message]
2020-03-25 1:43 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 09/10] iproto: refactor error encoding with mpstream Nikita Pettik
2020-03-30 23:24 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-04-01 15:54 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-03-25 1:43 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 10/10] iproto: support error stacked diagnostic area Nikita Pettik
2020-03-30 23:24 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-04-01 16:26 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-04-01 22:24 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-04-02 0:29 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-04-02 14:01 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-04-02 22:20 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-04-03 2:16 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-04-03 23:17 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-04-06 11:07 ` Nikita Pettik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1a94ba64-ac51-9320-12b3-433dbd9f82fa@tarantool.org \
--to=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--cc=korablev@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 08/10] box/error: clarify purpose of reference counting in struct error' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox