* [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix compilation of getmetatable() for UDTYPE_IO_FILE @ 2024-11-07 10:51 Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 2024-11-07 14:37 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 2024-11-12 19:23 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches @ 2024-11-07 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: tarantool-patches, Sergey Kaplun, Maxim Kokryashkin From: Sergey Bronnikov <sergeyb@tarantool.org> The patch fixes a problem with recording `getmetatable()` for I/O object: recording of `getmetatable` call with a file descriptors represented by userdata object `UDTYPE_IO_FILE` (like `io.stdout`) leads to violation of assertion in `rec_check_slots`. Note, the problem was fixed upstream in different manner, see commit 5141cbc20c43 ("Fix compiliation of getmetatable() for UDTYPE_IO_FILE."). --- src/lj_record.c | 2 +- ...-incorrect-recording-getmetatable.test.lua | 21 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-1279-incorrect-recording-getmetatable.test.lua diff --git a/src/lj_record.c b/src/lj_record.c index cc97bdf9..7181b72a 100644 --- a/src/lj_record.c +++ b/src/lj_record.c @@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ int lj_record_mm_lookup(jit_State *J, RecordIndex *ix, MMS mm) int udtype = udataV(&ix->tabv)->udtype; mt = tabref(udataV(&ix->tabv)->metatable); /* The metatables of special userdata objects are treated as immutable. */ - if (udtype != UDTYPE_USERDATA) { + if (udtype > UDTYPE_IO_FILE) { cTValue *mo; if (LJ_HASFFI && udtype == UDTYPE_FFI_CLIB) { /* Specialize to the C library namespace object. */ diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1279-incorrect-recording-getmetatable.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1279-incorrect-recording-getmetatable.test.lua new file mode 100644 index 00000000..8bf22ca7 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1279-incorrect-recording-getmetatable.test.lua @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +local tap = require('tap') + +local test = tap.test('lj-1279-incorrect-recording-getmetatable') +test:plan(1) + +-- A test file to demonstrate an incorrect recording of +-- getmetatable() for I/O handlers. +-- https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1279 + +jit.opt.start("hotloop=1") + +local obj = io.stdout +local getmetatable = getmetatable + +for _ = 1, 4 do + _ = getmetatable(obj) +end + +test:ok(true, 'getmetatable() recording is correct') + +test:done(true) -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix compilation of getmetatable() for UDTYPE_IO_FILE 2024-11-07 10:51 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix compilation of getmetatable() for UDTYPE_IO_FILE Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches @ 2024-11-07 14:37 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 2024-11-12 19:23 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches @ 2024-11-07 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sergey Bronnikov, tarantool-patches, Sergey Kaplun, Maxim Kokryashkin [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2387 bytes --] Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/ligurio/gh-1279-recording-getmetatable LJ issue: https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1279 On 07.11.2024 13:51, Sergey Bronnikov wrote: > From: Sergey Bronnikov<sergeyb@tarantool.org> > > The patch fixes a problem with recording `getmetatable()` > for I/O object: recording of `getmetatable` call with a file > descriptors represented by userdata object `UDTYPE_IO_FILE` > (like `io.stdout`) leads to violation of assertion in > `rec_check_slots`. > > Note, the problem was fixed upstream in different manner, see > commit 5141cbc20c43 > ("Fix compiliation of getmetatable() for UDTYPE_IO_FILE."). > --- > src/lj_record.c | 2 +- > ...-incorrect-recording-getmetatable.test.lua | 21 +++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-1279-incorrect-recording-getmetatable.test.lua > > diff --git a/src/lj_record.c b/src/lj_record.c > index cc97bdf9..7181b72a 100644 > --- a/src/lj_record.c > +++ b/src/lj_record.c > @@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ int lj_record_mm_lookup(jit_State *J, RecordIndex *ix, MMS mm) > int udtype = udataV(&ix->tabv)->udtype; > mt = tabref(udataV(&ix->tabv)->metatable); > /* The metatables of special userdata objects are treated as immutable. */ > - if (udtype != UDTYPE_USERDATA) { > + if (udtype > UDTYPE_IO_FILE) { > cTValue *mo; > if (LJ_HASFFI && udtype == UDTYPE_FFI_CLIB) { > /* Specialize to the C library namespace object. */ > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1279-incorrect-recording-getmetatable.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1279-incorrect-recording-getmetatable.test.lua > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..8bf22ca7 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1279-incorrect-recording-getmetatable.test.lua > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ > +local tap = require('tap') > + > +local test = tap.test('lj-1279-incorrect-recording-getmetatable') > +test:plan(1) > + > +-- A test file to demonstrate an incorrect recording of > +-- getmetatable() for I/O handlers. > +--https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1279 > + > +jit.opt.start("hotloop=1") > + > +local obj = io.stdout > +local getmetatable = getmetatable > + > +for _ = 1, 4 do > + _ = getmetatable(obj) > +end > + > +test:ok(true, 'getmetatable() recording is correct') > + > +test:done(true) [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3185 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix compilation of getmetatable() for UDTYPE_IO_FILE 2024-11-07 10:51 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix compilation of getmetatable() for UDTYPE_IO_FILE Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 2024-11-07 14:37 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches @ 2024-11-12 19:23 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2024-11-22 12:53 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches @ 2024-11-12 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sergey Bronnikov; +Cc: tarantool-patches Hi, Sergey! Thanks for the patch! Nice catch! Please, consider my comments below. On 07.11.24, Sergey Bronnikov wrote: > From: Sergey Bronnikov <sergeyb@tarantool.org> > > The patch fixes a problem with recording `getmetatable()` > for I/O object: recording of `getmetatable` call with a file Typo: s<I/O><an I/O> Typo: s/recording of/recording the/ Typo: s/a file/file/ > descriptors represented by userdata object `UDTYPE_IO_FILE` > (like `io.stdout`) leads to violation of assertion in > `rec_check_slots`. Nit: | ... by the userdata object `UDTYPE_IO_FILE` (like `io.stdout`) always | stores `nil` instead of the given metatable. This leads to the | violation of the assertion in `rec_check_slots`. > > Note, the problem was fixed upstream in different manner, see > commit 5141cbc20c43 Nit: Please, use full commit hash. Also, please describe that specialized recording (introduced in the upstream) lacks the check of the metatable precense. So, the fix in upstream is incomplete (according to the comment [1]). Also, please add both testcases from the issue comment [1] (don't forget to restore metatable after the first of them). > ("Fix compiliation of getmetatable() for UDTYPE_IO_FILE."). > --- > src/lj_record.c | 2 +- > ...-incorrect-recording-getmetatable.test.lua | 21 +++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-1279-incorrect-recording-getmetatable.test.lua > > diff --git a/src/lj_record.c b/src/lj_record.c > index cc97bdf9..7181b72a 100644 > --- a/src/lj_record.c > +++ b/src/lj_record.c <snipped> > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1279-incorrect-recording-getmetatable.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1279-incorrect-recording-getmetatable.test.lua > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..8bf22ca7 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1279-incorrect-recording-getmetatable.test.lua > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ > +local tap = require('tap') > + > +local test = tap.test('lj-1279-incorrect-recording-getmetatable') > +test:plan(1) > + > +-- A test file to demonstrate an incorrect recording of > +-- getmetatable() for I/O handlers. > +-- https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1279 Nit: Usually the link is right before `tap.test()` declaration. > + > +jit.opt.start("hotloop=1") Nit: Please use single quotes. > + > +local obj = io.stdout Minor: I would rather name the variable like the corresponding type -- `ud_io_file`. Feel free to ignore. > +local getmetatable = getmetatable > + > +for _ = 1, 4 do > + _ = getmetatable(obj) > +end > + > +test:ok(true, 'getmetatable() recording is correct') Let's check the resulted metatable too. (We can use `test:samevalues()` here, for example.) > + > +test:done(true) > -- > 2.34.1 > [1]: https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1279#issuecomment-2382392847 -- Best regards, Sergey Kaplun ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix compilation of getmetatable() for UDTYPE_IO_FILE 2024-11-12 19:23 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches @ 2024-11-22 12:53 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches @ 2024-11-22 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sergey Kaplun, Sergey Bronnikov; +Cc: tarantool-patches [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4097 bytes --] Hi, Sergey, please see below. Updated version has been force-pushed. Sergey On 12.11.2024 22:23, Sergey Kaplun wrote: > Hi, Sergey! > Thanks for the patch! > Nice catch! > > Please, consider my comments below. > > On 07.11.24, Sergey Bronnikov wrote: >> From: Sergey Bronnikov<sergeyb@tarantool.org> >> >> The patch fixes a problem with recording `getmetatable()` >> for I/O object: recording of `getmetatable` call with a file > Typo: s<I/O><an I/O> > Typo: s/recording of/recording the/ > Typo: s/a file/file/ Fixed. > >> descriptors represented by userdata object `UDTYPE_IO_FILE` >> (like `io.stdout`) leads to violation of assertion in >> `rec_check_slots`. > Nit: > | ... by the userdata object `UDTYPE_IO_FILE` (like `io.stdout`) always > | stores `nil` instead of the given metatable. This leads to the > | violation of the assertion in `rec_check_slots`. > >> Note, the problem was fixed upstream in different manner, see >> commit 5141cbc20c43 > Nit: Please, use full commit hash. Fixed, but usually ten characters is enough [1]: > Generally, eight to ten characters are more than enough to be unique within a project. For example, as of February 2019, the Linux kernel (which is a fairly sizable project) has over 875,000 commits and almost seven million objects in its object database, with no two objects whose SHA-1s are identical in the first 12 characters. 1. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Revision-Selection > Also, please describe that specialized recording (introduced in the > upstream) lacks the check of the metatable precense. So, the fix in > upstream is incomplete (according to the comment [1]). Added: Note, the problem was fixed upstream in different manner, see commit 5141cbc20c43921778ff36be541c15888bee8ee3 ("Fix compiliation of getmetatable() for UDTYPE_IO_FILE."). Note, the specialization omits the check of `__metatable` field precense and the check for the metatable itself. So, if we change the metatable on the object after the trace is compiled, the trace becomes invalid. The proposed test demonstrates these cases as well. > > Also, please add both testcases from the issue comment [1] (don't forget > to restore metatable after the first of them). Added. >> ("Fix compiliation of getmetatable() for UDTYPE_IO_FILE."). >> --- >> src/lj_record.c | 2 +- >> ...-incorrect-recording-getmetatable.test.lua | 21 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-1279-incorrect-recording-getmetatable.test.lua >> >> diff --git a/src/lj_record.c b/src/lj_record.c >> index cc97bdf9..7181b72a 100644 >> --- a/src/lj_record.c >> +++ b/src/lj_record.c > <snipped> > >> diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1279-incorrect-recording-getmetatable.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1279-incorrect-recording-getmetatable.test.lua >> new file mode 100644 >> index 00000000..8bf22ca7 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1279-incorrect-recording-getmetatable.test.lua >> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ >> +local tap = require('tap') >> + >> +local test = tap.test('lj-1279-incorrect-recording-getmetatable') >> +test:plan(1) >> + >> +-- A test file to demonstrate an incorrect recording of >> +-- getmetatable() for I/O handlers. >> +--https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1279 > Nit: Usually the link is right before `tap.test()` declaration. Fixed. > >> + >> +jit.opt.start("hotloop=1") > Nit: Please use single quotes. Fixed. > >> + >> +local obj = io.stdout > Minor: I would rather name the variable like the corresponding type -- > `ud_io_file`. Feel free to ignore. Fixed. > >> +local getmetatable = getmetatable >> + >> +for _ = 1, 4 do >> + _ = getmetatable(obj) >> +end >> + >> +test:ok(true, 'getmetatable() recording is correct') > Let's check the resulted metatable too. (We can use `test:samevalues()` > here, for example.) Fixed. > >> + >> +test:done(true) >> -- >> 2.34.1 >> > [1]:https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1279#issuecomment-2382392847 > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7433 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-22 12:53 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-11-07 10:51 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix compilation of getmetatable() for UDTYPE_IO_FILE Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 2024-11-07 14:37 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 2024-11-12 19:23 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2024-11-22 12:53 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox