From: "Максим Корякшин via Tarantool-patches" <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: "Sergey Kaplun" <skaplun@tarantool.org> Cc: "Maxim Kokryashkin" <max.kokryashkin@gmail.com>, tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] test: adapt test checking global environment Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 02:42:25 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1642462945.143863816@f326.i.mail.ru> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YbtOXwViQ4MuZfin@root> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4616 bytes --] Hello, Sergey! Thanks for the review! Here is the new commit message: ================================================================================ test: adapt test checking global environment LuaJIT doesn't take into account tail calls for call-level counting, so `getfenv()` behaviour is different in tail calls. getfenv()` default level is 1 which is invalid for the test case when is called from tail call (`lj_debug_frame()` returns NULL). This commits adds local variables, so there is no tail call any more. Part of tarantool/tarantool#5870 Resolves tarantool/tarantool#5713 ================================================================================ And the diff for the comment fix: ================================================================================ diff --git a/test/PUC-Rio-Lua-5.1-tests/closure.lua b/test/PUC-Rio-Lua-5.1-tests/closure.lua index 86f6ad87..c4491dcf 100644 --- a/test/PUC-Rio-Lua-5.1-tests/closure.lua +++ b/test/PUC-Rio-Lua-5.1-tests/closure.lua @@ -170,9 +170,10 @@ local function foo (a) -- LuaJIT doesn't take into account tail calls for -- call-level counting, so `getfenv()` behaviour is different --- in tail calls. For example, `pcall()` to this functon returns false --- in case of tailcall, because `getfenv()` default level is 1 which --- is invalid for this case (`lj_debug_frame()` returns NULL). +-- in tail calls. For example, `pcall()` to this functon returns +-- false in case of tailcall, because `getfenv()` default level +-- is 1 which is invalid for this case (`lj_debug_frame()` +-- returns NULL). -- See also https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5713. local env = getfenv() return env ================================================================================ Best regards, Maxim Kokryashkin > >>Hi, Maxim! >> >>Thanks for the fixes! >> >>LGTM, except a few nits below. >> >>On 06.10.21, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote: >>> LuaJIT doesn't take into account tail calls for >>> call-level counting, so `getfenv()` behaviour is different >>> in tail calls. getfenv()` default level is 1 which is invalid for >>> the test case when is called from tail call (`lj_debug_frame()` >>> returns NULL). >>> >>> This commits adds local varibles, so there is no tail call any more. >> >>Typo: s/varibles/variables/ >> >>> >>> Part of tarantool/tarantool#5870 >> >>It's OK to mention that this patch "Resolves tarantool/tarantool#5713". >> >>> --- >>> Issue: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5713 >>> GitHub branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/fckxorg/gh-5713-adapt-test-global-environment-PUC-Rio >>> CI: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/fckxorg/gh-5713-adapt-test-global-environment-PUC-Rio >>> >>> test/PUC-Rio-Lua-5.1-tests/closure.lua | 21 +++++++++++---------- >>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/test/PUC-Rio-Lua-5.1-tests/closure.lua b/test/PUC-Rio-Lua-5.1-tests/closure.lua >>> index 551fe70d..86f6ad87 100644 >>> --- a/test/PUC-Rio-Lua-5.1-tests/closure.lua >>> +++ b/test/PUC-Rio-Lua-5.1-tests/closure.lua >>> @@ -167,22 +167,23 @@ local function foo (a) >>> assert(getfenv(0) == a) >>> assert(getfenv(1) == _G) >>> assert(getfenv(loadstring"") == a) >>> - return getfenv() >>> + >>> +-- LuaJIT doesn't take into account tail calls for >>> +-- call-level counting, so `getfenv()` behaviour is different >>> +-- in tail calls. For example, `pcall()` to this functon returns false >>> +-- in case of tailcall, because `getfenv()` default level is 1 which >>> +-- is invalid for this case (`lj_debug_frame()` returns NULL). >>> +-- See also https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5713 . >> >>Minor: linewidth for comments is 66 symbols. >> >>> + local env = getfenv() >>> + return env >>> end >>> >>> f = coroutine.wrap(foo) >>> local a = {} >>> assert(f(a) == _G) >>> local a,b = pcall(f) >>> --- FIXME: LuaJIT doesn't take into account tail calls for >>> --- call-level counting, so `getfenv()` behaviour is different >>> --- in tail calls. For example, this `pcall()` returns false, >>> --- because `getfenv()` default level is 1 which is invalid for >>> --- this case when is called from tail call (`lj_debug_frame()` >>> --- returns NULL). >>> --- See also https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5713 . >>> --- Test is disabled for LuaJIT for now. >>> --- assert(a and b == _G) >>> +-- Test is adapted to the behavior LuaJIT. See the comment above. >>> +assert(a and b == _G) >>> >>> >>> -- tests for multiple yield/resume arguments >>> -- >>> 2.33.0 >>> >> >>-- >>Best regards, >>Sergey Kaplun > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6269 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-17 23:42 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-10-06 13:04 Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2021-12-16 14:34 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2022-01-17 23:42 ` Максим Корякшин via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2022-01-26 22:33 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches 2022-02-07 9:32 ` Максим Корякшин via Tarantool-patches 2022-01-17 23:43 ` Максим Корякшин via Tarantool-patches 2022-02-17 16:34 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2021-09-24 18:20 Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2021-10-05 17:37 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1642462945.143863816@f326.i.mail.ru \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org \ --cc=max.kokryashkin@gmail.com \ --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] test: adapt test checking global environment' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox