From: "Maria Khaydich" <maria.khaydich@tarantool.org> To: "Kirill Yukhin" <kyukhin@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>, "Vladislav Shpilevoy" <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] box: user.grant error should be versatile Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 17:21:00 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1582726860.445056855@f382.i.mail.ru> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200225222015.wt5azo2dlexkd745@tarantool.org> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4031 bytes --] Looks like this patch caused some tests to fail according to Sasha (avtikhon). I made another commit fixing the issue. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Previous commit that was merged into master did not do proper clean-up. That caused occasional failures of other tests, all with the same error saying user 'guest' already had access on universe. Closes #714 --- Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/compare/eljashm/gh-714-box-schema-user-grant-invalid-error test/box/access.result | 18 ++++++++++++------ test/box/access.test.lua | 10 ++++++---- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/box/access.result b/test/box/access.result index b454d0eaa..e351eaf2c 100644 --- a/test/box/access.result +++ b/test/box/access.result @@ -2113,23 +2113,29 @@ box.space._priv:delete{1, 'universe', 0} -- i.e. error on universally granted privileges shouldn't -- include any redundant details and/or symbols. -- -box.schema.user.grant('guest', 'read,write,execute', 'universe') +box.schema.user.create('grantee') --- ... -box.schema.user.grant('guest', 'read,write,execute', 'universe') +box.schema.user.grant('grantee', 'read,write,execute', 'universe') --- -- error: User 'guest' already has read,write,execute access on universe +... +box.schema.user.grant('grantee', 'read,write,execute', 'universe') +--- +- error: User 'grantee' already has read,write,execute access on universe ... -- Expected behavior of grant() error shouldn't change otherwise. sp = box.schema.create_space('not_universe') --- ... -box.schema.user.grant('guest', 'read,write,execute', 'space', 'not_universe') +box.schema.user.grant('grantee', 'read,write,execute', 'space', 'not_universe') +--- +... +box.schema.user.grant('grantee', 'read,write,execute', 'space', 'not_universe') --- +- error: User 'grantee' already has read,write,execute access on space 'not_universe' ... -box.schema.user.grant('guest', 'read,write,execute', 'space', 'not_universe') +box.schema.user.drop('grantee') --- -- error: User 'guest' already has read,write,execute access on space 'not_universe' ... sp:drop() --- diff --git a/test/box/access.test.lua b/test/box/access.test.lua index 387c8b06b..6be558247 100644 --- a/test/box/access.test.lua +++ b/test/box/access.test.lua @@ -812,11 +812,13 @@ box.space._priv:delete{1, 'universe', 0} -- i.e. error on universally granted privileges shouldn't -- include any redundant details and/or symbols. -- -box.schema.user.grant('guest', 'read,write,execute', 'universe') -box.schema.user.grant('guest', 'read,write,execute', 'universe') +box.schema.user.create('grantee') +box.schema.user.grant('grantee', 'read,write,execute', 'universe') +box.schema.user.grant('grantee', 'read,write,execute', 'universe') -- Expected behavior of grant() error shouldn't change otherwise. sp = box.schema.create_space('not_universe') -box.schema.user.grant('guest', 'read,write,execute', 'space', 'not_universe') -box.schema.user.grant('guest', 'read,write,execute', 'space', 'not_universe') +box.schema.user.grant('grantee', 'read,write,execute', 'space', 'not_universe') +box.schema.user.grant('grantee', 'read,write,execute', 'space', 'not_universe') +box.schema.user.drop('grantee') sp:drop() -- 2.24.0 >Среда, 26 февраля 2020, 1:20 +03:00 от Kirill Yukhin < kyukhin@tarantool.org >: > >Hello, > >On 19 фев 19:35, Maria Khaydich wrote: >> >> Error message on granted privileges was not flexible and >> did not distinguish between universal or any other priviliges >> leaving either 'nil' or simply '' at the end. >> >> Closes #714 >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Issue: >> https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/714 >> Branch: >> https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/eljashm/gh-714-box-schema-user-grant-invalid-error >I've checked your patch into master. > >-- >Regards, Kirill Yukhin -- Maria Khaydich [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5847 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-26 14:21 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-02-19 16:35 Maria Khaydich 2020-02-20 10:47 ` Igor Munkin 2020-02-20 15:48 ` Maria Khaydich 2020-02-20 22:44 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2020-02-20 22:45 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2020-02-24 19:57 ` Kirill Yukhin 2020-02-25 11:53 ` Maria Khaydich 2020-02-25 22:20 ` Kirill Yukhin 2020-02-26 14:21 ` Maria Khaydich [this message] 2020-02-26 14:55 ` Igor Munkin 2020-02-26 15:16 ` Alexander Tikhonov 2020-02-27 14:30 ` Igor Munkin 2020-02-27 21:06 ` Alexander Turenko
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1582726860.445056855@f382.i.mail.ru \ --to=maria.khaydich@tarantool.org \ --cc=kyukhin@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] box: user.grant error should be versatile' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox