Re: [Tarantool-patches] [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH] replication: freeze join vclock before read view

["Ilya Kosarev" <i.kosarev@tarantool.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1104 bytes --]


Ok, as far as wal_begin_checkpoint does pretty much the same thing as
wal_sync and allows us to obtain vclock in a more direct way, i see why
we should prefer it. Although it brings slight overhead comparing to
wal_sync, it doesn't really seem to be significant. Sent v2 of the patch.
>Понедельник, 28 октября 2019, 9:43 +03:00 от Konstantin Osipov <kostja.osipov@gmail.com>:
>
>* Ilya Kosarev < i.kosarev@tarantool.org > [19/10/28 09:41]:
>> The idea of the patch "relay: join new replicas off read view"
>> (6332aca655ae7f95d391bdc0109e79915f6e6ad0), which brought us to the
>> currently discussed patch, was to get rid of checkpoint as a prerequisite
>> of replica joining. Therefore, why would we need to perform checkpointing
>> here and how is it better than proposed approach, which seems to be more
>> lightweight?
>
>wel_begin_checkpoint() doesn't perform a checkpoint. It ensures
>the current state of the database is flushed to the write ahead log.
>
>I don't suggest a full blown checkpoint is initiated. 
>
>
>-- 
>Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia
>


-- 
Ilya Kosarev

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1612 bytes --]