From: "Timur Safin" <tsafin@tarantool.org> To: 'Vladislav Shpilevoy' <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>, tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, 'Kirill Yukhin' <kyukhin@tarantool.org> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] Work-around WSL assert when SO_LINGER is set on unix sockets Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:39:41 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <08e101d5f849$c605d630$52118290$@tarantool.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <b72f3b33-7afe-3f1f-690a-73cf51c9c765@tarantool.org> : -----Original Message----- : From: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> : Subject: Re: [PATCH] Work-around WSL assert when SO_LINGER is set on unix : sockets : : > : > Here I need a help, because evidence is not apparent. The last commit to : > evio.c was not marked with subsystem : > : > tsafin@M1BOOK6319:~/tarantool$ git log --oneline src/lib/core/evio.c : > 835d22aa0 (HEAD -> tsafin/gh-4659-wsl-no-linger-assert, master) : > Work-around WSL assert when SO_LINGER is set on unix sockets : > 3f5f59bb5 Move 'core' and 'uuid' libs to src/lib : > : > Should it be `core` or `coio`? : : I think neither of them. It should be 'evio'. : Ok, will use it for the next incarnation of reworked patch. : : If there is no issue, then you can omit issue link. But it certainly : is not right to take some random other issue number into the branch : name. Just omit the issue number everywhere. : : tsafin/wsl-no-linger-assert : : instead of : : tsafin/gh-4659-wsl-no-linger-assert : Ok, will use such naming schema : > Good question! Never had enough time and motivation to proof this : assumption. : > Now you've asked I'll look into linux kernel tcp implementation. Stay : ktuned. : : The question wasn't really about kernel sources. Rather about : documentation or standards, on which you could rely, when assume, : that SO_LINGER works for some socket types, and does not for : others. : : I don't think we can omit SO_LINGER in case it is not guaranteed : that it is no-op for unix sockets. : : However, we can omit it for WSL specifically, like Cyrill proposed. : Using cmake to add a new macro, and do nothing when macro says we : compile for WSL. Yup, dropped this patch already, and will pass down to sources something like WSL1_WORKAROUND defined. It should work in the nearest time-frame. WSL2 will go out of Insider Rings this April/May, so this workaround should be very short-living. WSL2 is using full Linux kernel (patched by Azure guys) so it will have the same tcp socket implementation, and work-around will be disabled then. Take care, Timur
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-12 8:39 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-03-10 14:25 Timur Safin 2020-03-11 0:30 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2020-03-11 10:43 ` Timur Safin 2020-03-11 10:53 ` Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-03-11 23:32 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2020-03-12 8:39 ` Timur Safin [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='08e101d5f849$c605d630$52118290$@tarantool.org' \ --to=tsafin@tarantool.org \ --cc=kyukhin@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] Work-around WSL assert when SO_LINGER is set on unix sockets' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox