From: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
To: Timur Safin <tsafin@tarantool.org>,
tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, alyapunov@tarantool.org,
korablev@tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 04/10] crc32: align memory access
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 01:23:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <05c14f7d-6f18-05ba-19ad-b5aa4dc91d17@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <048601d6352c$3cdb81a0$b69284e0$@tarantool.org>
Thanks for the review!
On 28/05/2020 22:11, Timur Safin wrote:
>
>
> : -----Original Message-----
> : From: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
> : Subject: [PATCH v2 04/10] crc32: align memory access
> :
> :
> : diff --git a/src/cpu_feature.c b/src/cpu_feature.c
> : index 98567ccb3..9bf6223de 100644
> : --- a/src/cpu_feature.c
> : +++ b/src/cpu_feature.c
> : @@ -50,7 +51,7 @@
> :
> :
> : static uint32_t
> : -crc32c_hw_byte(uint32_t crc, unsigned char const *data, unsigned int
> : length)
> : +crc32c_hw_byte(uint32_t crc, char const *data, unsigned int length)
> : {
> : while (length--) {
> : __asm__ __volatile__(
> : @@ -68,6 +69,26 @@ crc32c_hw_byte(uint32_t crc, unsigned char const *data,
> : unsigned int length)
> : uint32_t
> : crc32c_hw(uint32_t crc, const char *buf, unsigned int len)
> : {
> : + const int align = alignof(unsigned long);
> : + unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)buf;
> : + unsigned int not_aligned_prefix =
> : + ((addr - 1 + align) & ~(align - 1)) - addr;
>
> Hmm, hmm...
>
> Isn't it simple `addr % align`? Or even `addr & (align - 1)` ?
Consider the example: addr = 14, align = 8.
Then not_aligned_prefix = 2. Need to read first 2
bytes one by one to get to 16, the closest aligned
address.
addr % align = 14 % 8 = 6 != 2
addr & (align - 1) = 14 & 7 = 1110 & 0111 = 110 = 6 != 2
But yeah, this could be done simpler: align - addr % align.
This will give how many bytes are needed to the next
aligned address. I wrote the solution above by blindly using
'aligned - not aligned' and the same schema as in
small_align().
Here is the diff:
====================
diff --git a/src/cpu_feature.c b/src/cpu_feature.c
index 9bf6223de..7b284fa98 100644
--- a/src/cpu_feature.c
+++ b/src/cpu_feature.c
@@ -69,10 +69,8 @@ crc32c_hw_byte(uint32_t crc, char const *data, unsigned int length)
uint32_t
crc32c_hw(uint32_t crc, const char *buf, unsigned int len)
{
- const int align = alignof(unsigned long);
- unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)buf;
- unsigned int not_aligned_prefix =
- ((addr - 1 + align) & ~(align - 1)) - addr;
+ const unsigned int align = alignof(unsigned long);
+ unsigned int not_aligned_prefix = align - (unsigned long)buf % align;
/*
* Calculate CRC32 for the prefix byte-by-byte so as to
* then use aligned words to calculate the rest. This is
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-28 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-27 23:32 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 00/10] Sanitize unaligned access Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-27 23:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 01/10] small: sanitized rlist and new region API Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-28 20:41 ` Timur Safin
2020-05-28 22:56 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-06-08 23:01 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-27 23:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 10/10] xrow: use unaligned store operation in xrow_to_iovec() Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-28 20:20 ` Timur Safin
2020-05-27 23:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 02/10] cmake: ignore warnings on alignof() and offsetof() Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-28 20:18 ` Timur Safin
2020-05-29 6:24 ` Kirill Yukhin
2020-05-29 22:34 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-27 23:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 03/10] cmake: add option ENABLE_UB_SANITIZER Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-28 20:42 ` Timur Safin
2020-05-29 8:53 ` Sergey Bronnikov
2020-05-29 22:36 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-27 23:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 04/10] crc32: align memory access Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-28 20:11 ` Timur Safin
2020-05-28 23:23 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy [this message]
2020-05-28 23:32 ` Timur Safin
2020-06-08 22:33 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-27 23:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 05/10] sql: make BtCursor's memory aligned Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-28 20:20 ` Timur Safin
2020-05-27 23:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 06/10] region: use aligned allocations where necessary Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-28 20:35 ` Timur Safin
2020-05-28 23:07 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-27 23:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 07/10] vinyl: align statements and bps tree extents Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-28 20:38 ` Timur Safin
2020-05-27 23:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 08/10] tuple: use unaligned store-load for field map Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-28 20:22 ` Timur Safin
2020-05-27 23:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 09/10] port: make port_c_entry not PACKED Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-28 20:42 ` Timur Safin
2020-06-03 21:27 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 00/10] Sanitize unaligned access Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-06-08 22:33 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=05c14f7d-6f18-05ba-19ad-b5aa4dc91d17@tarantool.org \
--to=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--cc=alyapunov@tarantool.org \
--cc=korablev@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=tsafin@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 04/10] crc32: align memory access' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox