From: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> To: Nikita Pettik <korablev@tarantool.org>, Mergen Imeev <imeevma@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-discussions@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-discussions] SQL built-in functions position Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 22:07:50 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <85c30425-ae7f-b485-4be5-dcad0b1c1cb6@tarantool.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200928181913.GD14909@tarantool.org> Hi! See my response in another email with 4 big reasons why storage of SQL-specific functions in _func is a bad idea. Also see responses on your comments in separate sections. I leave references below. On 28.09.2020 20:19, Nikita Pettik wrote: > On 27 Sep 18:18, Mergen Imeev wrote: >> Hi all. I have a question that I would like to discuss. >> >> The question is about SQL built-in functions. At the moment these functions >> are >> partially described in _func and partially in src/box/sql/func.c. I received >> two >> completely different suggestions from my reviewers on what to do with these >> functions: >> 1) Move definitions completely to _func. Remove definitions from func.c. > > That's my proposal. It makes name collisions check simple, See "## Built-in functions prevent duplicates in _func?". > provides unified interface to invoke built-in and non-built-in functions, See "## Storage in _func unifies functions?". > allows to grant and verify priveleges in the same way and so forth. See "## Built-in functions require privileges?". > Built-ins are already declaraed in _func, so reverting this thing would result> in another one unnecessary schema change and upgrade (so I doubt that implementation would > be somehow 'simpler'). See "## Storage in _func does not change _func schema and documentation?". > Finally part of functions can turn out to be really > usefull in Lua someday such as date()/time(). See "## Reuse SQL functions in Lua and other languages?". > So to me the choice is kind > of obvious.. It still is not to me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-28 20:07 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-09-27 15:18 Mergen Imeev 2020-09-27 20:56 ` Peter Gulutzan 2020-09-28 20:07 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2020-09-29 19:22 ` Peter Gulutzan 2020-09-28 18:19 ` Nikita Pettik 2020-09-28 20:07 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy [this message] 2020-09-28 20:07 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2020-10-01 14:46 ` Kirill Yukhin 2020-10-01 21:15 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2020-10-02 15:18 ` Mergen Imeev
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=85c30425-ae7f-b485-4be5-dcad0b1c1cb6@tarantool.org \ --to=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --cc=imeevma@tarantool.org \ --cc=korablev@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-discussions@dev.tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-discussions] SQL built-in functions position' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox