[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 luajit 30/41] perf: adjust scimark-lu in LuaJIT-benches

[Sergey Bronnikov]

Hi, Sergey,

thanks for the patch! LGTM

Sergey

On 12/26/25 12:18, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> This patch adjusts the aforementioned test to use the benchmark
> framework introduced before. The default arguments are adjusted
> according to the <PARAM_x86.txt> file. The arguments to the script still
> can be provided in the command line run.
>
> Checks are omitted since they were not present in the original suite,
> plus the precise result value depends on the input parameter.
> ---
>   perf/LuaJIT-benches/scimark-lu.lua | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/perf/LuaJIT-benches/scimark-lu.lua b/perf/LuaJIT-benches/scimark-lu.lua
> index 7636d994..4f521e0b 100644
> --- a/perf/LuaJIT-benches/scimark-lu.lua
> +++ b/perf/LuaJIT-benches/scimark-lu.lua
> @@ -1 +1,19 @@
> -require("scimark_lib").LU(100)(tonumber(arg and arg[1]) or 5000)
> +local bench = require("bench").new(arg)
> +
> +local cycles = tonumber(arg and arg[1]) or 5000
Why this option is absent in usage?
> +
> +local benchmark
> +benchmark = {
> +  name = "scimark_lu",
> +  -- XXX: The description of tests for the function is too
> +  -- inconvenient.
> +  skip_check = true,
> +  payload = function()
> +    local flops = require("scimark_lib").LU(100)(cycles)
> +    benchmark.items = flops
> +  end,
> +}
> +
> +bench:add(benchmark)
> +
> +bench:run_and_report()
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/attachments/20260102/80a922ab/attachment.htm>