[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/2] Fix unsinking TNEW with huge asize

Igor Munkin imun at tarantool.org
Thu Feb 15 16:45:47 MSK 2024


Sergey,

I've checked the patchset into all long-term branches in
tarantool/luajit and bumped a new version in master, release/3.0 and
release/2.11.

On 24.01.24, Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches wrote:
> The first patch isn't necessary for the problem reproducer, but it
> simplifies it a lot. Plus, it's an easy optimization, so whatever.
> The second patch fixed the mentioned problem.
> 
> Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/lj-1132-bad-snap-refs
> 
> The Tarantool's CI is broken for macOS for now, so just ignore these red
> crosses.
> 
> Tarantool PR: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/pull/9618
> Related issues:
> * https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/9595
> * https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1128
> * https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1132
> 
> 
> Mike Pall (2):
>   Optimize table.new() with constant args to (sinkable) IR_TNEW.
>   Only emit proper parent references in snapshot replay.
> 
>  src/lj_ffrecord.c                             |   9 ++
>  src/lj_snap.c                                 |  12 +-
>  .../lj-1128-table-new-opt-tnew.test.lua       | 112 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../lj-1132-bad-snap-refs.test.lua            |  36 ++++++
>  4 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-1128-table-new-opt-tnew.test.lua
>  create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-1132-bad-snap-refs.test.lua
> 
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

-- 
Best regards,
IM


More information about the Tarantool-patches mailing list