[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v3] sysprof: fix crash during FFUNC stream
Maxim Kokryashkin
m.kokryashkin at tarantool.org
Thu Nov 9 02:01:50 MSK 2023
Hi!
Thanks for the review!
Fixed your comment, branch is force-pushed. Diff is below:
===
diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/gh-8594-sysprof-ffunc-crash.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/gh-8594-sysprof-ffunc-crash.test.lua
index 347bd087..90a19156 100644
--- a/test/tarantool-tests/gh-8594-sysprof-ffunc-crash.test.lua
+++ b/test/tarantool-tests/gh-8594-sysprof-ffunc-crash.test.lua
@@ -48,6 +48,6 @@ end
res, err = misc.sysprof.stop()
assert(res, err)
-test:ok(true, 'sysprof finished successfully')
+test:ok(true, 'FFUNC frames were streamed correctly')
os.exit(test:check() and 0 or 1)
===
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 06:47:28PM +0300, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
> Hi, Max
>
> sorry for a delayed answer.
>
> LGTM with a minor comment
>
>
> On 7/14/23 17:30, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote:
> >
> <snipped>
> >
> >
> > > +end
> > > +
> > > +res, err = misc.sysprof.stop()
> > > +assert(res, err)
> > > +
> > > +test:ok(true, 'sysprof finished successfully')
> >
> I propose to reflect a goal of the test in a test description. Please add
> something about ffunc to description.
>
> The test is not about whole sysprof, but about ffunc support in sysprof.
>
> > > +
> > > +os.exit(test:check() and 0 or 1)
> >
> >
More information about the Tarantool-patches
mailing list