[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/4] test: add skipcond on architectures for memprof

[Sergey Kaplun]

Hi, Igor!

Thanks for the review!

On 10.06.21, Igor Munkin wrote:
> Sergey,
> 
> Thanks for the patch! Consider the couple of nits below regarding the
> commit wording. Otherwise, LGTM.
> 
> Minor: It's hard to parse the patch subject IMHO. I propose the
> following rewording:
> | test: add arch-specific skipcond for memprof
> 
> On 24.05.21, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> > Memprof's tests fail for architectures different from x86 and x64,
> > because memprof is not yet implemented for them.
> > 
> > This patch adds skip condition to corresponding test.
> 
> Typo: s/to corresponding/to the corresponding/.

Fixed. Branch is force-pushed. The new commit message is:

===================================================================
test: add arch-specific skipcond for memprof

Memprof's tests fail for architectures different from x86 and x64,
because memprof is not yet implemented for them.

This patch adds skip condition to the corresponding test.
===================================================================

> 
> > ---
> >  test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua
> > index b4d66509..4df9cfd8 100644
> > --- a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua
> > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua
> > @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
> > +-- Memprof is implemented only for x86 and x64 architectures.
> > +require("utils").skipcond(
> > +  jit.arch ~= "x86" or jit.arch ~= "x64",
> 
> Side note: Seen the bunch with the related fixes on the branch.
> 
> > +  jit.arch.." architecture is NIY for memprof"
> > +)
> > +
> >  local tap = require("tap")
> >  
> >  local test = tap.test("misc-memprof-lapi")
> > -- 
> > 2.31.0
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> IM

-- 
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun