[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 5/5] Apply Clang formatter
kyukhin at tarantool.org
Wed Nov 11 11:23:37 MSK 2020
On 10 Nov 21:38, Vladislav Shpilevoy wrote:
> > On 02 Nov 22:05, Vladislav Shpilevoy wrote:
> >> Ok. I will review the whole patch, every single line. Don't push
> >> it beforehand then.
> > In my previous e-mail I've explicitly stated that current formatter
> > is not suitable for us. Quote:
> >>> After all, having p.3 and p.8 unresolved I guess we cannot proceed
> >>> without changes to formatter.
> > Please, see what does it mean here .
> >  - https://translate.google.com/#view=home&op=translate&sl=auto&tl=ru&text=After%20all%2C%20having%20p.3%20and%20p.8%20unresolved%20I%20guess%20we%20cannot%20proceed%20without%20changes%20to%20formatter.
> Ok, lets play quotes. Here is yours:
> I am not sure. Anyway I think this is not a blocker for having fully automated
> code formatting.
> Talking of this quote:
> After all, having p.3 and p.8 unresolved I guess we cannot proceed
> without changes to formatter.
> It is not the same as saying that we won't use the formatter. You just said,
> you will try to fix review points 3 and 8. Which were not even the worst.
> Which leads to the point you are ok with the other issues. Tons of
> other issues, as I found in the detailed review. And I am not ok with these
You understood completely correct. To the moment we cannot use Clang formatter
since it has unresolvable flaws (in p.3 and p.8). But that doesn't mean we
won't use one of code checkers if found them suitable or if Clang formatter
will become better.
Thanks for sharing your `not ok`, all wyou contributions seems very valuable,
however this doesn't seem to be a blocker.
Regards, Kirill Yukhin
More information about the Tarantool-patches