[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v9 4/7] qsync: direct write of CONFIRM/ROLLBACK into a journal

Serge Petrenko sergepetrenko at tarantool.org
Fri Aug 21 11:36:57 MSK 2020


Thanks for the patch!
LGTM.
 
  
>Четверг, 20 августа 2020, 0:35 +03:00 от Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov at gmail.com>:
> 
>When we need to write CONFIRM or ROLLBACK message (which is
>a binary record in msgpack format) into a journal we use txn code
>to allocate a new transaction, encode there a message and pass it
>to walk the long txn path before it hit the journal. This is not
>only resource wasting but also somehow strange from architectural
>point of view.
>
>Instead lets encode a record on the stack and write it to the journal
>directly.
>
>Part-of #5129
>
>Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov < gorcunov at gmail.com >
>---
> src/box/txn_limbo.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/src/box/txn_limbo.c b/src/box/txn_limbo.c
>index e458dad75..4b90d7fa5 100644
>--- a/src/box/txn_limbo.c
>+++ b/src/box/txn_limbo.c
>@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> #include "txn_limbo.h"
> #include "replication.h"
> #include "iproto_constants.h"
>+#include "journal.h"
> 
> struct txn_limbo txn_limbo;
> 
>@@ -272,6 +273,17 @@ txn_limbo_wait_complete(struct txn_limbo *limbo, struct txn_limbo_entry *entry)
>  return 0;
> }
> 
>+/**
>+ * A callback for synchronous write: txn_limbo_write_synchro fiber
>+ * waiting to proceed once a record is written to WAL.
>+ */
>+static void
>+txn_limbo_write_cb(struct journal_entry *entry)
>+{
>+ assert(entry->complete_data != NULL);
>+ fiber_wakeup(entry->complete_data);
>+}
>+
> static void
> txn_limbo_write_synchro(struct txn_limbo *limbo, uint32_t type, int64_t lsn)
> {
>@@ -285,46 +297,36 @@ txn_limbo_write_synchro(struct txn_limbo *limbo, uint32_t type, int64_t lsn)
> 
>  /*
>  * This is a synchronous commit so we can
>- * use body and row allocated on a stack.
>+ * allocate everything on a stack.
>  */
>  struct synchro_body_bin body;
>  struct xrow_header row;
>- struct request request = {
>- .header = &row,
>- };
>+ char buf[sizeof(struct journal_entry) +
>+ sizeof(struct xrow_header *)];
> 
>- struct txn *txn = txn_begin();
>- if (txn == NULL)
>- goto rollback;
>+ struct journal_entry *entry = (struct journal_entry *)buf;
>+ entry->rows[0] = &row;
> 
>  xrow_encode_synchro(&row, &body, &req);
> 
>- /*
>- * This is not really a transaction. It just uses txn API
>- * to put the data into WAL. And obviously it should not
>- * go to the limbo and block on the very same sync
>- * transaction which it tries to confirm now.
>- */
>- txn_set_flag(txn, TXN_FORCE_ASYNC);
>-
>- if (txn_begin_stmt(txn, NULL) != 0)
>- goto rollback;
>- if (txn_commit_stmt(txn, &request) != 0)
>- goto rollback;
>- if (txn_commit(txn) != 0)
>- goto rollback;
>- return;
>+ journal_entry_create(entry, 1, xrow_approx_len(&row),
>+ txn_limbo_write_cb, fiber());
> 
>-rollback:
>- /*
>- * XXX: the stub is supposed to be removed once it is defined what to do
>- * when a synchro request WAL write fails. One of the possible
>- * solutions: log the error, keep the limbo queue as is and probably put
>- * in rollback mode. Then provide a hook to call manually when WAL
>- * problems are fixed. Or retry automatically with some period.
>- */
>- panic("Could not write a synchro request to WAL: lsn = %lld, type = "
>- "%s\n", lsn, iproto_type_name(type));
>+ if (journal_write(entry) != 0 || entry->res < 0) {
>+ diag_set(ClientError, ER_WAL_IO);
>+ diag_log();
>+ /*
>+ * XXX: the stub is supposed to be removed once it is defined
>+ * what to do when a synchro request WAL write fails. One of
>+ * the possible solutions: log the error, keep the limbo
>+ * queue as is and probably put in rollback mode. Then
>+ * provide a hook to call manually when WAL problems are fixed.
>+ * Or retry automatically with some period.
>+ */
>+ panic("Could not write a synchro request to WAL: "
>+ "lsn = %lld, type = %s\n", lsn,
>+ type == IPROTO_CONFIRM ? "CONFIRM" : "ROLLBACK");
>+ }
> }
> 
> /**
>--
>2.26.2
 
 
--
Serge Petrenko  
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/attachments/20200821/23db33ad/attachment.html>


More information about the Tarantool-patches mailing list