[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] sql: invalid integer type in arithmetic operations

[Vladislav Shpilevoy]

> diff --git a/src/box/sql/expr.c b/src/box/sql/expr.c
> index b3613d3ea..9b52e90f3 100644
> --- a/src/box/sql/expr.c
> +++ b/src/box/sql/expr.c
> @@ -342,8 +342,19 @@ sql_expr_coll(Parse *parse, Expr *p, bool *is_explicit_coll, uint32_t *coll_id,
>  enum field_type
>  sql_type_result(enum field_type lhs, enum field_type rhs)
>  {
> -	if (sql_type_is_numeric(lhs) || sql_type_is_numeric(rhs))
> +	if (sql_type_is_numeric(lhs) || sql_type_is_numeric(rhs)) {
> +		if (lhs == FIELD_TYPE_NUMBER || rhs == FIELD_TYPE_NUMBER)
> +			return FIELD_TYPE_NUMBER;
> +		if (lhs == FIELD_TYPE_INTEGER || rhs == FIELD_TYPE_INTEGER)
> +			return FIELD_TYPE_INTEGER;
> +		/*
> +		 * FIXME: FIELD_TYPE_UNSIGNED static type is not
> +		 * allowed yet.
> +		 */
> +		assert(lhs == FIELD_TYPE_UNSIGNED ||
> +		       rhs == FIELD_TYPE_UNSIGNED);

How does it work? If it is not allowed, then lhs and rhs should not
be equal to FIELD_TYPE_UNSIGNED, and this assertion should fail, it is not?

(I did not test, just looked at the diff in the mailing list)

>  		return FIELD_TYPE_NUMBER;
> +	}
>  	return FIELD_TYPE_SCALAR;
>  }
>