Hi, Sergey

thanks for the answers.

On 13.06.2024 13:31, Sergey Kaplun wrote:

<snipped>

> +test:skipcond({
>>> +  -- luacheck: no global
>> I made a patch that remove inline suppressions [1].
>>
>> I propose to merge it and remove inline suppressions in your patch
>> series too.
> Ok, I'll remove these supressions after merging your patch and rebasing
> to the master.
Okay!
> <snipped>
>
>>>    
>>> +-- We only need the abort reason in the test.
>>> +jparse.start('t')
>> Same comment as in previous mail - let's add a comment regarding 't'.
> See my answers here [1].
Okay!
>
>>> +
>>>    -- XXX: Update hotcounts to avoid hash collisions.
>>>    jit.opt.start('hotloop=1')
>>> -
>>>    jit.on()
>>>    
>>>    mockalloc.mock()
>>> @@ -49,6 +58,28 @@ tracef()
>>>    
>>>    mockalloc.unmock()
>> Same comment as in previous mail - let's avoid name 'mock' here.
> But we actually mock the allocator here, don't we?
> Thus, I renamed the new allocated function to avoid confusion.
> If you insist, please suggest the correct name instead `mock` |
> `unmock`.

We can replace "mock"/"unmock" to "{enable, disable} error injection".

Actually, I don't want to insist. I'm ok if it wouldn't confuse anyone.

>>>    
> <snipped>
>
>>>    test:done(true)
> [1]:https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/2024-June/029218.html
>