Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: v.ioffe@tarantool.org, kyukhin@tarantool.org
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 1/2] applier: fix upstream.lag calculations
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 18:15:22 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f16add774e5e455bc158b5cb04d9c917d0f12f2d.1629126742.git.sergepetrenko@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1629126742.git.sergepetrenko@tarantool.org>

upstream.lag is the delta between the moment when a row was written to
master's journal and the moment when it was received by the replica.
It's an important metric to check whether the replica has fallen too far
behind master.

Not all the rows coming from master have a valid time of creation. For
example, RAFT system messages don't have one, and we can't assign
correct time to them: these messages do not originate from the journal,
and assigning current time to them would lead to jumps in upstream.lag
results.

Stop updating upstream.lag for rows which don't have creation time
assigned.

The upstream.lag calculation changes were meant to fix the flaky
replication/errinj.test:

 Test failed! Result content mismatch:
 --- replication/errinj.result	Fri Aug 13 15:15:35 2021
 +++ /tmp/tnt/rejects/replication/errinj.reject	Fri Aug 13 15:40:39 2021
 @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@
  ...
  box.info.replication[1].upstream.lag < 1
  ---
 -- true
 +- false
  ...

But the changes were not enough, because now the test
may see the initial lag value (TIMEOUT_INFINITY).
So fix the test as well by waiting until upstream.lag becomes < 1.
---
 src/box/applier.cc               | 3 ++-
 test/replication/errinj.result   | 5 ++++-
 test/replication/errinj.test.lua | 5 ++++-
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/box/applier.cc b/src/box/applier.cc
index 902d0bc72..9256078e1 100644
--- a/src/box/applier.cc
+++ b/src/box/applier.cc
@@ -664,7 +664,8 @@ applier_read_tx_row(struct applier *applier, double timeout)
 
 	coio_read_xrow_timeout_xc(coio, ibuf, row, timeout);
 
-	applier->lag = ev_now(loop()) - row->tm;
+	if (row->tm > 0)
+		applier->lag = ev_now(loop()) - row->tm;
 	applier->last_row_time = ev_monotonic_now(loop());
 	return tx_row;
 }
diff --git a/test/replication/errinj.result b/test/replication/errinj.result
index 9d13f6aa7..ec251182f 100644
--- a/test/replication/errinj.result
+++ b/test/replication/errinj.result
@@ -308,7 +308,10 @@ box.info.replication[1].upstream.lag > 0
 ---
 - true
 ...
-box.info.replication[1].upstream.lag < 1
+-- Upstream lag is huge until the first row is received.
+test_run:wait_cond(function()\
+    return box.info.replication[1].upstream.lag < 1\
+end)
 ---
 - true
 ...
diff --git a/test/replication/errinj.test.lua b/test/replication/errinj.test.lua
index 19234ab35..7f6535ec1 100644
--- a/test/replication/errinj.test.lua
+++ b/test/replication/errinj.test.lua
@@ -130,7 +130,10 @@ test_run:cmd("switch replica")
 while box.info.replication[1].upstream.status ~= 'follow' do fiber.sleep(0.0001) end
 box.info.replication[1].upstream.status
 box.info.replication[1].upstream.lag > 0
-box.info.replication[1].upstream.lag < 1
+-- Upstream lag is huge until the first row is received.
+test_run:wait_cond(function()\
+    return box.info.replication[1].upstream.lag < 1\
+end)
 -- wait for ack timeout
 test_run:wait_upstream(1, {status='disconnected', message_re='unexpected EOF'})
 
-- 
2.30.1 (Apple Git-130)


  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-16 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-16 15:15 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 0/2] fix a couple of flaky tests Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-08-16 15:15 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2021-08-16 16:25   ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 1/2] applier: fix upstream.lag calculations Vitaliia Ioffe via Tarantool-patches
2021-08-16 15:15 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 2/2] replication: fix flaky election_basic test Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-08-17  7:21 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 0/2] fix a couple of flaky tests Kirill Yukhin via Tarantool-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f16add774e5e455bc158b5cb04d9c917d0f12f2d.1629126742.git.sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=kyukhin@tarantool.org \
    --cc=sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \
    --cc=v.ioffe@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 1/2] applier: fix upstream.lag calculations' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox