Hi, Max

thanks for review!

On 19.08.2024 12:45, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote:
> Hi, Sergey!
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> As this thread replies grew way beyond comprehensible limit, I'll refer
> to the GitHub commit instead.
>
>> Sergey Bronnikov:
>> * added the description and the trimmed the test for the problem
> Typo: s/the trimmed/trimmed/
>
> <lj-865-cross-generation-mach-o-file.test.lua>
>
> Lines: 149-150:
>> -- The function builds a Mach-O object file and retrieves its
>> -- header fields.
> I believe, "validates" fits better than "retrieves" here.
>
> Line: 153:
>> -- LuaJIT always generate 64-bit, non-FAT Mach-O object files.
> Typo: s/generate/generates/

Both typos were fixed:


--- a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-865-cross-generation-mach-o-file.test.lua
+++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-865-cross-generation-mach-o-file.test.lua
@@ -146,11 +146,11 @@ local function read_mach_o_hdr(buf, hw_arch)
    return mach_header
  end

--- The function builds a Mach-O object file and retrieves its
+-- The function builds a Mach-O object file and validates its
  -- header fields.
  local function build_and_check_mach_o(subtest)
    local hw_arch = subtest.name
-  -- LuaJIT always generate 64-bit, non-FAT Mach-O object files.
+  -- LuaJIT always generates 64-bit, non-FAT Mach-O object files.
    assert(hw_arch == 'arm64')

    subtest:plan(5)
>
> Otherwise, LGTM.