From: Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>, gorcunov@gmail.com Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 7/7] replication: do not ignore replica vclock on register Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:33:34 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <d6888f7d-d35b-4cb2-3e0a-9f23e8a14703@tarantool.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <618c1086-2bcd-ea5e-1d4c-54da8b6fa36b@tarantool.org> 27.03.2021 23:13, Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches пишет: > > > 26.03.2021 23:50, Vladislav Shpilevoy пишет: >> Thanks for the patch! >> >> See 2 comments below. >> >> On 24.03.2021 13:24, Serge Petrenko wrote: >>> There was a bug in box_process_register. It decoded replica's vclock >>> but >>> never used it when sending the registration stream. So the replica >>> might >>> lose the data in range (replica_vclock, start_vclock). >> 1. Could you please add a test? > > Yes, sure. > >> >>> Follow-up #5566 >>> --- >>> src/box/box.cc | 14 ++++++-------- >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/src/box/box.cc b/src/box/box.cc >>> index 292a54213..0bcb505a8 100644 >>> --- a/src/box/box.cc >>> +++ b/src/box/box.cc >>> @@ -2154,7 +2154,8 @@ box_process_register(struct ev_io *io, struct >>> xrow_header *header) >>> "wal_mode = 'none'"); >>> } >>> - struct gc_consumer *gc = >>> gc_consumer_register(&replicaset.vclock, >>> + vclock_reset(&replica_vclock, 0, vclock_get(&replicaset.vclock, >>> 0)); >> 2. xrow_decode_register_xc() already returns the vclock with empty 0 >> part. Why do you need this reset? > > It sets vclock[0] to master's vclock[0]. But it's not needed here, > indeed. > Thanks for noticing! > > I thought having vclock[0] = 0 would harm gc somehow, but that's not > true. > I'm returning this vclock_reset, and here's why. It doesn't set vclock[0] to 0. It sets it to match master's vclock[0]. This is needed, because recovery tries to find xlog with vclock strictly less or equal to the vclock provided. If we leave vclock[0] = 0, recovery will try to open the last xlog which had vclock[0] = 0. This log may be already deleted, which was the reason for test failures in CI. Strangely enough, I couldn't reproduce the issue locally. Anyway, here you go: ================================================ diff --git a/src/box/box.cc b/src/box/box.cc index ecec8df27..4da274976 100644 --- a/src/box/box.cc +++ b/src/box/box.cc @@ -2154,6 +2154,8 @@ box_process_register(struct ev_io *io, struct xrow_header *header) "wal_mode = 'none'"); } + /* @sa box_process_subscribe(). */ + vclock_reset(&replica_vclock, 0, vclock_get(&replicaset.vclock, 0)); struct gc_consumer *gc = gc_consumer_register(&replica_vclock, "replica %s", tt_uuid_str(&instance_uuid)); if (gc == NULL) ================================================ >> >>> + struct gc_consumer *gc = gc_consumer_register(&replica_vclock, >>> "replica %s", tt_uuid_str(&instance_uuid)); >>> if (gc == NULL) >>> diag_raise(); > > ================================= > > diff --git a/src/box/box.cc b/src/box/box.cc > index 0bcb505a8..ecec8df27 100644 > --- a/src/box/box.cc > +++ b/src/box/box.cc > @@ -2154,7 +2154,6 @@ box_process_register(struct ev_io *io, struct > xrow_header *header) > "wal_mode = 'none'"); > } > > - vclock_reset(&replica_vclock, 0, vclock_get(&replicaset.vclock, 0)); > struct gc_consumer *gc = gc_consumer_register(&replica_vclock, > "replica %s", tt_uuid_str(&instance_uuid)); > if (gc == NULL) > diff --git a/test/replication/anon_register_gap.result > b/test/replication/anon_register_gap.result > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000..24a3548c8 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/test/replication/anon_register_gap.result > @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ > +-- test-run result file version 2 > +test_run = require('test_run').new() > + | --- > + | ... > + > +-- > +-- When master's registering an anonymous replica, it might ignore > the replica's > +-- current vclock, and skip the data in range (replica_clock, > master_clock). > +-- > +box.schema.user.grant('guest', 'replication') > + | --- > + | ... > +_ = box.schema.space.create('test') > + | --- > + | ... > +_ = box.space.test:create_index('pk') > + | --- > + | ... > + > +test_run:cmd('create server replica with rpl_master=default,\ > + script="replication/anon1.lua"') > + | --- > + | - true > + | ... > +test_run:cmd('start server replica') > + | --- > + | - true > + | ... > + > +test_run:wait_lsn('replica', 'default') > + | --- > + | ... > +box.error.injection.set('ERRINJ_RELAY_SEND_DELAY', true) > + | --- > + | - ok > + | ... > + > +box.space.test:insert{1} > + | --- > + | - [1] > + | ... > + > +test_run:switch('replica') > + | --- > + | - true > + | ... > + > +test_run:wait_upstream(1, {status='disconnected'}) > + | --- > + | - true > + | ... > +box.space.test:select{} > + | --- > + | - [] > + | ... > + > +fiber = require('fiber') > + | --- > + | ... > +f = fiber.new(function() box.cfg{replication_anon=false} end) > + | --- > + | ... > +test_run:wait_upstream(1, {status='register'}) > + | --- > + | - true > + | ... > + > +test_run:switch('default') > + | --- > + | - true > + | ... > +box.error.injection.set('ERRINJ_RELAY_SEND_DELAY', false) > + | --- > + | - ok > + | ... > +box.space.test:insert{2} > + | --- > + | - [2] > + | ... > + > +test_run:switch('replica') > + | --- > + | - true > + | ... > +test_run:wait_lsn('replica', 'default') > + | --- > + | ... > +f:status() > + | --- > + | - dead > + | ... > +box.space.test:select{} > + | --- > + | - - [1] > + | - [2] > + | ... > + > +-- Cleanup > +test_run:switch('default') > + | --- > + | - true > + | ... > +test_run:cmd('stop server replica') > + | --- > + | - true > + | ... > +test_run:cmd('delete server replica') > + | --- > + | - true > + | ... > +box.space.test:drop() > + | --- > + | ... > +box.schema.user.revoke('guest', 'replication') > + | --- > + | ... > diff --git a/test/replication/anon_register_gap.test.lua > b/test/replication/anon_register_gap.test.lua > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000..c71576a23 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/test/replication/anon_register_gap.test.lua > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ > +test_run = require('test_run').new() > + > +-- > +-- When master's registering an anonymous replica, it might ignore > the replica's > +-- current vclock, and skip the data in range (replica_clock, > master_clock). > +-- > +box.schema.user.grant('guest', 'replication') > +_ = box.schema.space.create('test') > +_ = box.space.test:create_index('pk') > + > +test_run:cmd('create server replica with rpl_master=default,\ > + script="replication/anon1.lua"') > +test_run:cmd('start server replica') > + > +test_run:wait_lsn('replica', 'default') > +box.error.injection.set('ERRINJ_RELAY_SEND_DELAY', true) > + > +box.space.test:insert{1} > + > +test_run:switch('replica') > + > +test_run:wait_upstream(1, {status='disconnected'}) > +box.space.test:select{} > + > +fiber = require('fiber') > +f = fiber.new(function() box.cfg{replication_anon=false} end) > +test_run:wait_upstream(1, {status='register'}) > + > +test_run:switch('default') > +box.error.injection.set('ERRINJ_RELAY_SEND_DELAY', false) > +box.space.test:insert{2} > + > +test_run:switch('replica') > +test_run:wait_lsn('replica', 'default') > +f:status() > +box.space.test:select{} > + > +-- Cleanup > +test_run:switch('default') > +test_run:cmd('stop server replica') > +test_run:cmd('delete server replica') > +box.space.test:drop() > +box.schema.user.revoke('guest', 'replication') > diff --git a/test/replication/suite.cfg b/test/replication/suite.cfg > index aea8b6157..aff5fda26 100644 > --- a/test/replication/suite.cfg > +++ b/test/replication/suite.cfg > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ > { > "anon.test.lua": {}, > + "anon_register_gap.test.lua": {}, > "gh-2991-misc-asserts-on-update.test.lua": {}, > "gh-3111-misc-rebootstrap-from-ro-master.test.lua": {}, > "gh-3160-misc-heartbeats-on-master-changes.test.lua": {}, > diff --git a/test/replication/suite.ini b/test/replication/suite.ini > index fc161700a..a9e44e8cf 100644 > --- a/test/replication/suite.ini > +++ b/test/replication/suite.ini > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ core = tarantool > script = master.lua > description = tarantool/box, replication > disabled = consistent.test.lua > -release_disabled = catch.test.lua errinj.test.lua gc.test.lua > gc_no_space.test.lua before_replace.test.lua qsync_advanced.test.lua > qsync_errinj.test.lua quorum.test.lua recover_missing_xlog.test.lua > sync.test.lua long_row_timeout.test.lua gh-4739-vclock-assert.test.lua > gh-4730-applier-rollback.test.lua gh-5140-qsync-casc-rollback.test.lua > gh-5144-qsync-dup-confirm.test.lua > gh-5167-qsync-rollback-snap.test.lua gh-5506-election-on-off.test.lua > gh-5536-wal-limit.test.lua hang_on_synchro_fail.test.lua > +release_disabled = catch.test.lua errinj.test.lua gc.test.lua > gc_no_space.test.lua before_replace.test.lua qsync_advanced.test.lua > qsync_errinj.test.lua quorum.test.lua recover_missing_xlog.test.lua > sync.test.lua long_row_timeout.test.lua gh-4739-vclock-assert.test.lua > gh-4730-applier-rollback.test.lua gh-5140-qsync-casc-rollback.test.lua > gh-5144-qsync-dup-confirm.test.lua > gh-5167-qsync-rollback-snap.test.lua gh-5506-election-on-off.test.lua > gh-5536-wal-limit.test.lua hang_on_synchro_fail.test.lua > anon_register_gap.test.lua > config = suite.cfg > lua_libs = lua/fast_replica.lua lua/rlimit.lua > use_unix_sockets = True > -- Serge Petrenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-30 12:33 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-03-24 12:24 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 0/7] applier: handle synchronous transactions during final Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-24 12:24 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 1/7] replication: fix a hang on final join retry Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-26 20:44 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-27 16:52 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-29 21:50 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-24 12:24 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 2/7] applier: extract tx boundary checks from applier_read_tx into a separate routine Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-26 12:35 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-27 16:54 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-24 12:24 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 3/7] applier: extract plain tx application from applier_apply_tx() Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-26 20:47 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-27 17:34 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-27 18:30 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 3.5/7] applier: fix not releasing the latch on apply_synchro_row() fail Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-29 21:50 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-30 8:15 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-24 12:24 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 4/7] applier: remove excess last_row_time update from subscribe loop Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-24 12:24 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 5/7] applier: make final join transactional Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-26 20:49 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-27 19:05 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-29 21:51 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-30 8:15 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-24 12:24 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 6/7] replication: tolerate synchro rollback during final join Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-24 12:45 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-26 20:49 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-27 19:23 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-24 12:24 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 7/7] replication: do not ignore replica vclock on register Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-26 20:50 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-27 20:13 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-29 21:51 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-30 8:16 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-30 12:33 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2021-03-26 13:46 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 0/7] applier: handle synchronous transactions during final Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-30 20:13 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-04-05 16:15 ` Kirill Yukhin via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=d6888f7d-d35b-4cb2-3e0a-9f23e8a14703@tarantool.org \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \ --cc=sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \ --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 7/7] replication: do not ignore replica vclock on register' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox