From: Oleg Babin via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>,
tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH vshard 0/4] Router msgpack object and netbox return_raw
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 19:55:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d414cb96-8ebe-408e-948a-9a9509198af2@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d7e54de5-552f-0588-ed14-6857af5703af@tarantool.org>
Hi! I remembered one more moment. Could we support return_raw for
vshard.router.map_callrw?
On 12.02.2022 02:05, Vladislav Shpilevoy wrote:
> Pushed to master.
>
> But the ticket isn't finished yet. I need to measure performance of return_raw
> vs normal call with full encode/decode of all values. It is in progress.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-15 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-09 0:32 Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2022-02-09 0:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH vshard 1/4] test: support luatest Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2022-02-09 17:53 ` Oleg Babin via Tarantool-patches
2022-02-10 22:32 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2022-02-11 16:38 ` Oleg Babin via Tarantool-patches
2022-02-09 0:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH vshard 2/4] util: introduce Tarantool's semver parser Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2022-02-09 17:53 ` Oleg Babin via Tarantool-patches
2022-02-10 22:33 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2022-02-11 16:38 ` Oleg Babin via Tarantool-patches
2022-02-09 0:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH vshard 3/4] router: support msgpack object args Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2022-02-09 17:53 ` Oleg Babin via Tarantool-patches
2022-02-10 22:33 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2022-02-11 16:38 ` Oleg Babin via Tarantool-patches
2022-02-09 0:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH vshard 4/4] router: support netbox return_raw Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2022-02-09 17:53 ` Oleg Babin via Tarantool-patches
2022-02-10 22:34 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2022-02-11 16:38 ` Oleg Babin via Tarantool-patches
2022-02-11 23:05 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH vshard 0/4] Router msgpack object and " Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2022-02-15 16:55 ` Oleg Babin via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2022-02-15 21:16 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d414cb96-8ebe-408e-948a-9a9509198af2@tarantool.org \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=olegrok@tarantool.org \
--cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH vshard 0/4] Router msgpack object and netbox return_raw' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox