From: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> To: Ilya Kosarev <i.kosarev@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4] core: introduce evenly distributed int64 random in range Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 23:07:12 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <c486b384-600a-9b7c-ec46-d279f986d0af@tarantool.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201105120923.10940-1-i.kosarev@tarantool.org> Hi! Thanks for the fixes! I hope we will end this eventually :) See 2 comments below. > diff --git a/test/unit/random.c b/test/unit/random.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000..858ff7867 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/test/unit/random.c > @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ > +#include <core/random.h> > + > +#include <stdio.h> > +#include <assert.h> > + > +#include "unit.h" > + > +static void > +test_random_in_range_one(int64_t min, int64_t max) > +{ > + int64_t result = pseudo_random_in_range(min, max); > + assert(min <= result && result <= max); > + if (min == max) > + printf("pseudo_random_in_range(%lld, %lld) = %lld\n", > + (long long)min, (long long)max, (long long)result); > + > + result = real_random_in_range(min, max); > + assert(min <= result && result <= max); > + if (min == max) > + printf("real_random_in_range(%lld, %lld) = %lld\n", > + (long long)min, (long long)max, (long long)result); 1. By using printf as a checker you complicate Sergey's life in scope of this https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5000. Because your output is not TAP. Better not print anything except via helpers from unit.h, and use ok()/is()/isnt() for actual tests. > +} > diff --git a/test/unit/swim_test_utils.c b/test/unit/swim_test_utils.c > index 9dbd28a9f..7ac43d82d 100644 > --- a/test/unit/swim_test_utils.c > +++ b/test/unit/swim_test_utils.c > @@ -875,7 +875,8 @@ swim_run_test(const char *log_file, fiber_func test) > * Print the seed to be able to reproduce a bug with the > * same seed. > */ > - say_info("Random seed = %llu", (unsigned long long) seed); > + say_info("Random seed = %llu", (unsigned long long)seed); 2. Why did you change this line?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-11 22:07 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-11-05 12:09 Ilya Kosarev 2020-11-11 22:07 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy [this message] 2020-11-13 11:54 ` Ilya Kosarev -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2020-11-05 11:14 Ilya Kosarev 2020-11-05 11:07 Ilya Kosarev
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=c486b384-600a-9b7c-ec46-d279f986d0af@tarantool.org \ --to=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --cc=i.kosarev@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4] core: introduce evenly distributed int64 random in range' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox