Hi, Sergey! thanks for the patch! LGTM On 10.01.2025 16:07, Sergey Kaplun wrote: > From: Mike Pall > > (cherry picked from commit 43d0a19158ceabaa51b0462c1ebc97612b420a2e) > > The previous commit accidentally removes the check that fusing > optimization isn't performing across the call to the `table.clear()`. > This commit fixes the behaviour by adding the corresponding check that > depends on the first bit of `check` masks in the `noconflict()` routine. > > Sergey Kaplun: > * added the description for the problem > > Part of tarantool/tarantool#10709 > --- > src/lj_asm_x86.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/lj_asm_x86.h b/src/lj_asm_x86.h > index d77087d6..a96bc2e7 100644 > --- a/src/lj_asm_x86.h > +++ b/src/lj_asm_x86.h > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static int noconflict(ASMState *as, IRRef ref, IROp conflict, int check) > while (--i > ref) { > if (ir[i].o == conflict) > return 0; /* Conflict found. */ > - else if ((check & 1) && ir[i].o == IR_NEWREF) > + else if ((check & 1) && (ir[i].o == IR_NEWREF || ir[i].o == IR_CALLS)) > return 0; > else if ((check & 2) && (ir[i].op1 == ref || ir[i].op2 == ref)) > return 0;