From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
Received: from smtp40.i.mail.ru (smtp40.i.mail.ru [94.100.177.100])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9E4D445321
 for <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>;
 Thu, 16 Jul 2020 03:05:28 +0300 (MSK)
References: <1594821336-14468-1-git-send-email-alyapunov@tarantool.org>
 <1594821336-14468-5-git-send-email-alyapunov@tarantool.org>
From: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
Message-ID: <ba96bc4b-48d9-68f0-fde2-09ad62802b8d@tarantool.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 02:05:27 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1594821336-14468-5-git-send-email-alyapunov@tarantool.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 04/13] txm: introduce dirty tuples
List-Id: Tarantool development patches <tarantool-patches.dev.tarantool.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/options/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/listinfo/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Aleksandr Lyapunov <alyapunov@tarantool.org>, tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org

Thanks for the patch!

> diff --git a/src/box/tuple.h b/src/box/tuple.h
> index 9a88772..4752323 100644
> --- a/src/box/tuple.h
> +++ b/src/box/tuple.h
> @@ -1081,8 +1087,10 @@ tuple_unref(struct tuple *tuple)
>  	assert(tuple->refs - 1 >= 0);
>  	if (unlikely(tuple->is_bigref))
>  		tuple_unref_slow(tuple);
> -	else if (--tuple->refs == 0)
> +	else if (--tuple->refs == 0) {
> +		assert(!tuple->is_dirty);

My question regarding this assertion remains - who is supposed
to remove the flag and when?