Hi, Sergey,

thanks for the comments! See my replies below.


On 6/4/25 11:35, Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches wrote:
Hi, Sergey!
Thanks for the patch!
LGTM, with minor comments below.

On 16.05.25, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
It is not allowed to call a function `sysprof.report()` without
stopping profiler. However, sometimes it may be useful to analyze
Typo: s/profiler/the profiler/
Fixed.

      
numbers provided by the report without stopping the profiler. The
patch removes the appropriate condition and allows reporting
without stopping.

Resolves tarantool/tarantool#11229
---
Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/ligurio/gh-11229-misc.sysprof.report
Issue: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/11229

 src/lj_sysprof.c                               |  2 --
 .../profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi.test.lua    | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/lj_sysprof.c b/src/lj_sysprof.c
index 88c7a41b..cf6161a5 100644
--- a/src/lj_sysprof.c
+++ b/src/lj_sysprof.c
<snipped>

diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi.test.lua
index f316c390..3e774a53 100644
--- a/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi.test.lua
+++ b/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi.test.lua
<snipped>

@@ -166,13 +166,27 @@ test:is(err, nil, "no error with good interval 1")
 test:is(errno, nil, "no errno with good interval 1")
 misc.sysprof.stop()
 
+-- Intermediate sysprof.report().
+res, err, errno = misc.sysprof.start{
+    mode = "C",
I suppose we don't need to run the profiler in "C" mode. Let's use "D"
here.

Fixed.

--- a/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi.test.lua
+++ b/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi.test.lua
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ misc.sysprof.stop()
 
 -- Intermediate sysprof.report().
 res, err, errno = misc.sysprof.start{
-    mode = "C",
+    mode = "D",
     interval = 1,
     path = "/dev/null",
 }


+    interval = 1,
+    path = "/dev/null",
+}
+test:is(res, true, "res is correct")
+test:is(err, nil, "no error")
+test:is(errno, nil, "no errno")
I suppose that 2 last checks are excess. The first one is enough to be
sure that the profiler is started. Also, we may use `assert()` here
instead of `test:is()` check, since we don't want to _test_ the starting of
the profiler only to _assert_ that the sysprof has been started.

last two checks were removed and test:is() replaced with assert()
+
+local report = misc.sysprof.report()
+test:ok(report.samples == 0, "total number of samples is non-zero")
I'm not sure that this will always be true (for example, in coverage
workflow). I suggest increasing the interval dramatically to avoid false
positives here.
Updated.

      
+misc.sysprof.stop()
+
<snipped>

2.43.0