Hi, Sergey,
thanks for the comments! See my replies below.
Fixed.Hi, Sergey! Thanks for the patch! LGTM, with minor comments below. On 16.05.25, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:It is not allowed to call a function `sysprof.report()` without stopping profiler. However, sometimes it may be useful to analyzeTypo: s/profiler/the profiler/
numbers provided by the report without stopping the profiler. The patch removes the appropriate condition and allows reporting without stopping. Resolves tarantool/tarantool#11229 --- Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/ligurio/gh-11229-misc.sysprof.report Issue: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/11229 src/lj_sysprof.c | 2 -- .../profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi.test.lua | 18 ++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/lj_sysprof.c b/src/lj_sysprof.c index 88c7a41b..cf6161a5 100644 --- a/src/lj_sysprof.c +++ b/src/lj_sysprof.c<snipped>diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi.test.lua index f316c390..3e774a53 100644 --- a/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi.test.lua +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi.test.lua<snipped>@@ -166,13 +166,27 @@ test:is(err, nil, "no error with good interval 1") test:is(errno, nil, "no errno with good interval 1") misc.sysprof.stop() +-- Intermediate sysprof.report(). +res, err, errno = misc.sysprof.start{ + mode = "C",I suppose we don't need to run the profiler in "C" mode. Let's use "D" here.
Fixed.
---
a/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi.test.lua
+++ b/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi.test.lua
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ misc.sysprof.stop()
-- Intermediate sysprof.report().
res, err, errno = misc.sysprof.start{
- mode = "C",
+ mode = "D",
interval = 1,
path = "/dev/null",
}
last two checks were removed and test:is() replaced with assert()+ interval = 1, + path = "/dev/null", +} +test:is(res, true, "res is correct") +test:is(err, nil, "no error") +test:is(errno, nil, "no errno")I suppose that 2 last checks are excess. The first one is enough to be sure that the profiler is started. Also, we may use `assert()` here instead of `test:is()` check, since we don't want to _test_ the starting of the profiler only to _assert_ that the sysprof has been started.
Updated.+ +local report = misc.sysprof.report() +test:ok(report.samples == 0, "total number of samples is non-zero")I'm not sure that this will always be true (for example, in coverage workflow). I suggest increasing the interval dramatically to avoid false positives here.
+misc.sysprof.stop() +<snipped>2.43.0