Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Maxim Kokryashkin <max.kokryashkin@gmail.com>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix memory probing allocator to check for valid end address, too.
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 17:10:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZKRSeXq+4sm+PURO@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230531132806.216178-1-m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org>

Max,

I've checked the patchset into all long-term branches in
tarantool/luajit and bumped a new version in master, release/2.11 and
release/2.10.

On 31.05.23, Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches wrote:
> From: Mike Pall <mike>
> 
> (cherry-picked from commit 646148e747759f0af3b47f9bd287cedd7e174631)
> 
> Before the patch `mmap_probe` only checked if the allocated chunk
> start was within the 2^LJ_ALLOC_MBITS bytes region. However, if the
> chunk is big enough, its end can reach outside of that region. This
> patch adds the corresponding check, to avoid such situations.
> 
> Maxim Kokryashkin:
> * added the description and the test for the problem
> 
> Part of tarantool/tarantool#8516
> ---
> Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/fckxorg/lj-445-fix-memory-probing-allocator
> PR: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/pull/8720
> LuaJIT issue: https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/445
> 
>  src/lj_alloc.c                                |  3 +-
>  ...-445-fix-memory-probing-allocator.test.lua | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-445-fix-memory-probing-allocator.test.lua
> 

<snipped>

> -- 
> 2.40.1
> 

-- 
Best regards,
IM

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-04 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-31 13:28 Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-06 13:51 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-07 13:03   ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-09 10:03     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-13  9:25       ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-07-03  8:24 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-07-04 17:10 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZKRSeXq+4sm+PURO@tarantool.org \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=imun@tarantool.org \
    --cc=max.kokryashkin@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix memory probing allocator to check for valid end address, too.' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox