From: Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix interaction between profiler hooks and finalizers. Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 15:10:24 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <Yr2SsOJzMUdql5y3@tarantool.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220606133528.13355-1-skaplun@tarantool.org> Sergey, I've checked the patch into all long-term branches in tarantool/luajit and bumped a new version in master, 2.10 and 1.10. On 06.06.22, Sergey Kaplun wrote: > From: Mike Pall <mike> > > Thanks to Julien Desgats. > > (cherry picked from commit 92fa45f9eb5d9aa732c6b972a85c26120d7612b4) > > Embedded LuaJIT profiler uses the following approach: > * Create trigger on timer signals, which set `HOOK_PROFILE` flag on > `g->hookmask` (if not set already) and update all BC instructions > dispatch. > * When any of instruction is executed, callback set by user on profiler > initialize is called. After the dispatch table updated again to > the old static values, and flags are reset. > * `HOOK_PROFILE` flag will set again and dispatch will updated at the next > tick of the timer. > > Before call to __gc finalizer the old hookmask is saved to be restored > later. When the second step is happening on call of __gc metamethod > `HOOK_PROFILE` flag is reset. But right after that the old hook > disposition (with `HOOK_PROFILE`) is restored, when we leaving > `gc_call_finalizer()` without updating the dispatch table, so the > profiler callback is never called again. > > This patch updates dispatch table right after hooks manipulation in > `gc_call_finalizer()` and prevent ticks influence inside finalizer > calls. > > Sergey Kaplun: > * added the description and the test for the problem > > Part of tarantool/tarantool#6548 > --- > > Side note: PR has 2 extra commits because the tarantool/luajit master > (tarantool branch) isn't bumped in the tarantool yet. > > Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/lj-512-profiler-hook-finalizers-full-ci > Tarantool PR: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/pull/7237 > Related issues: > * https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/512 > * https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/6548 > > > src/lj_gc.c | 2 ++ > src/lj_obj.h | 3 +- > src/lj_profile.c | 2 +- > .../lj-512-profiler-hook-finalizers.test.lua | 31 +++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-512-profiler-hook-finalizers.test.lua > <snipped> > -- > 2.34.1 > -- Best regards, IM
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-30 12:19 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-06-06 13:35 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2022-06-27 16:22 ` sergos via Tarantool-patches 2022-06-29 8:07 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches 2022-06-30 12:10 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=Yr2SsOJzMUdql5y3@tarantool.org \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=imun@tarantool.org \ --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix interaction between profiler hooks and finalizers.' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox