From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 4BF172256E
	for <tarantool-patches@freelists.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 16:34:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id cxKPm5A3j1bu for <tarantool-patches@freelists.org>;
	Tue, 10 Jul 2018 16:34:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp51.i.mail.ru (smtp51.i.mail.ru [94.100.177.111])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTPS id 086072229D
	for <tarantool-patches@freelists.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 16:34:36 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] sql: remove OP_LoadPtr
From: "n.pettik" <korablev@tarantool.org>
In-Reply-To: <e25ac786-bb45-a7e4-444b-d2b77b57d6df@tarantool.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 23:34:34 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E70CED0D-075C-4EFB-8A93-6DA7F36E35F5@tarantool.org>
References: <cover.1531242355.git.kshcherbatov@tarantool.org>
 <cover.1531242355.git.kshcherbatov@tarantool.org>
 <8e1537ec82992142f31fe561102fdbce690d1754.1531242355.git.kshcherbatov@tarantool.org>
 <450C4EA0-0803-4298-A3D4-D80A97145B66@tarantool.org>
 <e25ac786-bb45-a7e4-444b-d2b77b57d6df@tarantool.org>
Sender: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org
Errors-to: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org
Reply-To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@freelists.org?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <tarantool-patches-request@freelists.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches.freelists.org>
List-subscribe: <tarantool-patches-request@freelists.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:>
List-post: <mailto:tarantool-patches@freelists.org>
List-archive: <http://www.freelists.org/archives/tarantool-patches>
To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org
Cc: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>


> Yes, you are wrong here, because it was used to restore pointer to
> struct space "_index", but "_index" is a system space, and it is never
> altered. So pointer to "_index" is always valid, and it makes no sense
> to restore it on runtime.

Then I am OK with last patch in series.