> On 7 May 2019, at 20:47, Kirill Shcherbatov <kshcherbatov@tarantool.org> wrote:
> 
> ;
> > +	if (sql_bind_decode(&bind, i + 1, &new_tuple) != 0 ||
> > +	    sql_bind_column(ck_constraint->stmt, &bind, i + 1) != 0) {
> > +	diag_set(ClientError, ER_CK_CONSTRAINT_FAILED,
> > +	ck_constraint->def->name,
> > +	ck_constraint->def->expr_str);
> > +	return -1;
> >This looks like a pessimization to me. Depending on the >code flow,
> >some of the tuple fields may not be accessed at all. Is it >really
> >necessary to decode them so agressibvely here? 
> >Especially since
> >you encode *all* space fields.
> 
> I'll try to walk though the AST tree and prepare the map of fields that are involved in expression (on check compile operation);
> Here there would be binding of **used** fields.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
To be honest, I don’t get what Konstantin really meant in his next letter.
I’m ok with your approach.